What Influences the Cross-Border Air Pollutant Transfer in China-United States Trade: A Comparative Analysis Using the Extended IO-SDA Method

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Shichun [1 ]
Gao, Chang [1 ]
Li, Yunfan [1 ]
Ma, Xiaoxue [1 ]
Zhou, Yifeng [1 ]
He, Zhengxia [2 ]
Zhao, Bin [3 ]
Wang, Shuxiao [4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Management, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Normal Univ, Sch Business, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
cross-border air pollutant transfer; embodied air pollutants; China-US trade; extended IO-SDA method; export; import; EMBODIED CARBON; STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION; DRIVING FORCES; SUPPLY CHAINS; US TRADE; EMISSIONS; ENERGY; FOOTPRINTS; INTENSITY; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.3390/su11226252
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper extends the IO-SDA (input-output and structural decomposition analysis) method to decompose the CBAPT (cross-border air pollutant transfer) into different effects, and reveals the status of CBAPT and analyzes influencing factors affecting the CBAPT in China-US trade by comparing China with the US in these factors. This study found that China was a net air pollutant exporter, and this indicates the air pollutants were transferred from the US into China through China-US trade. On the whole, the China energy intensity, China emission coefficient, and import scale effects decreased the CBAPT, whereas the export scale and US emission coefficient effects increased the CBAPT; the influences of export structure, US energy intensity, and import structure on CBAPT were uncertain. The sectoral distribution of effects on the CBAPT in China-US trade was unbalanced, which was mainly concentrated in heavy industry and transportation. The China energy intensity, China emission coefficient, and import scale effects inhibited sectoral CBAPT, and the export scale effect promoted this sectoral transfer. Other effects on the sectoral transfer were negligible. This paper provides some policy suggestions based on empirical results.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据