Nurses', midwives' and key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of a scope of nursing and midwifery practice framework

被引:18
|
作者
Casey, Mary [1 ]
Fealy, Gerard [2 ]
Kennedy, Catriona [3 ]
Hegarty, Josephine [4 ]
Prizeman, Geraldine [5 ]
McNamara, Martin [6 ]
O'Reilly, Pauline [7 ]
Brady, Anne-Marie [8 ]
Rohde, Daniela [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Sch Nursing Midwifery & Hlth Syst, Taught Grad & CPD Programmes, Belfield, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Sch Nursing Midwifery & Hlth Syst, Belfield, Ireland
[3] Univ Limerick, Sch Nursing Midwifery, Limerick, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Cork, Catherine McAuley Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Cork, Ireland
[5] Univ Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[6] UCD Sch Nursing Midwifery & Hlth Syst, Sch, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Univ Limerick, Dept Nursing & Midwifery, Limerick, Ireland
[8] Trinity Coll Dublin, Teaching & Learning Postgrad, Dublin, Ireland
[9] Univ Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
experiences; framework; midwifery; nursing; professional practice; qualitative research; scope of practice; stakeholder; thematic analysis;
D O I
10.1111/jan.12603
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimThis paper reports on the qualitative findings from a national review of a nursing and midwifery scope of practice framework. BackgroundScope of professional practice frameworks offers a system of rules and principles to regulate its members and demonstrate its responsibility to society. Key issues in reviewing the scope of practice include notions of specialist and advanced practice, accountability, autonomy, competence, supervision, continuing professional development and delegation. Evaluation of scope of practice frameworks has particular application value to nurses, midwives, regulatory bodies and healthcare employers across the globe. DesignA mixed methods approach was used. This included a national survey of nurses and midwives and focus groups and interviews with key stakeholders. The qualitative data are reported in this paper. MethodsFocus groups and interviews were conducted among a convenience purposive sample of key stakeholders, including nurses and midwives working in the widest range of services and settings in 2014. The participants contributed to thirteen focus groups and thirteen interviews. FindingsSix global themes, as follows: Evolution of the nursing and midwifery professions and practice; Scope of practice: understanding and use; Expanding scope of practice; Professional competence; Practice setting and context; Reflections on the current framework. ConclusionPractitioners understand the scope of professional practice and while some see it as empowering others see it as potentially restrictive. Nurses and midwives are generally willing to expand their scope of practice and see it as resulting in improved patient care, improvement in overall quality of standards and increased job satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1237
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nurses', midwives' and key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions on requirements to demonstrate the maintenance of professional competence
    Casey, Mary
    Cooney, Adeline
    O'Connell, Rhona
    Hegarty, Josephine-Mary
    Brady, Anne-Marie
    O'Reilly, Pauline
    Kennedy, Catriona
    Heffernan, Elizabeth
    Fealy, Gerard
    McNamara, Martin
    O'Connor, Laserina
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (03) : 653 - 664
  • [2] The perceptions of key stakeholders of the roles of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practitioners
    Casey, Mary
    O'Connor, Laserina
    Nicholson, Emma
    Smith, Rita
    O'Brien, Denise
    O'Leary, Denise
    Fealy, Gerard M.
    Mcnamara, Martin S.
    Stokes, Diarmuid
    Egan, Claire
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (12) : 3007 - 3016
  • [3] Leadership in nursing and midwifery: Activities and associated competencies of advanced practice nurses and midwives
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Goemaes, Regine
    Verhaeghe, Sofie
    Beyers, Wim
    Decoene, Elsie
    Beeckman, Dimitri
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2019, 27 (06) : 1261 - 1274
  • [4] Midwifery at the crossroads in Estonia: attitudes of midwives and other key stakeholders
    Lazarus, JV
    Rasch, V
    Liljestrand, J
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 84 (04) : 339 - 348
  • [5] Midwives' understanding of perinatal depression and the scope of midwifery practice
    Hurt, Dianne
    Fowler, Cathrine
    Foureur, Maralyn
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2015, 28 (01) : S18 - S19
  • [6] Ghanaian nurses' and midwives' perspectives on technology adoption in nursing and midwifery education
    Adjei, Charles Ampong
    Adjorlolo, Samuel
    Kyei, Josephine
    Ohene, Lillian Akorfa
    Dzansi, Gladys
    Acheampong, Angela Kwartemaa
    Asante, Isabella Naana Akyaa
    Woolley, Philomena
    Nyante, Felix
    Aziato, Lydia
    NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (02): : 754 - 764
  • [7] Exploring midwives' experiences of implementing the Labour Hopscotch Framework: A midwifery innovation
    O'Brien, Denise
    Coughlan, Barbara
    Thompson, Sinead
    Carroll, Lorraine
    Sheehy, Lucille
    Brosnan, Mary
    Cronin, Martina
    McCreery, Teresa
    Doherty, Jean
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY, 2022, 6
  • [8] A straight line up - Experiences of midwives in the Darwin Midwifery Group Practice
    Hunter, Hilary
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2011, 24 : S6 - S6
  • [9] Towards a values-based person specification for recruitment of compassionate nursing and midwifery candidates: A study of registered and student nurses' and midwives' perceptions of prerequisite attributes and key skills
    Waugh, Anne
    Smith, Dave
    Horsburgh, Dorothy
    Gray, Morag
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2014, 34 (09) : 1190 - 1195
  • [10] Single Registered Midwives in Small Maternity Units: Experiences with Midwifery and Nursing work
    Bull, Angela
    Bayes, Sara
    Geraghty, Sadie
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2023, 36 : S3 - S3