Postoperative gemcitabine alone and concurrent with radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

被引:1
|
作者
Ozkok, Serdar
Demirci, Senem [1 ]
Yalman, Deniz
Zeytunlu, Murat [2 ]
Nart, Deniz [3 ]
Yuzer, Yildiray [2 ]
Coker, Ahmet [2 ]
Goker, Erdem [4 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[3] Ege Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[4] Ege Univ, Fac Med, Tulay Aktas Oncol Hosp, Div Med Oncol, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
来源
TUMORI JOURNAL | 2010年 / 96卷 / 04期
关键词
gemcitabine; pancreatic cancer; postoperative radiochemotherapy; prognostic factors; PHASE-I TRIAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FULL-DOSE GEMCITABINE; LYMPH-NODE RATIO; CURATIVE RESECTION; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; ADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; GASTRIC-CANCER; HEAD CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1177/030089161009600408
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims and background. To evaluate the treatment results of gemcitabine alone and concurrent with radiotherapy after R0/R1 resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods and study design. From 1999 to 2005, 55 patients with stage II resected pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine-based radiochemotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. Initially, one cycle of induction gemcitabine was administered and followed by weekly gemcitabine concurrent with radiotherapy. After the completion of radiochemotherapy, patients received 3 additional courses of gemcitabine. Results. Thirteen patients were stage IIA and 42 were stage JIB. Forty-six patients (83.6%) had RO and 9 patients (16.4%) had R1 resection. All of the patients received induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy, all but 3 received concurrent radiochemotherapy, and 46 (84%) patients received maintenance chemotherapy. During induction, concurrent and maintenance phases of the protocol, 11%, 13.5% and 19.5% of the patients had at least one grade 3 toxicity, respectively. Within a median 47 months (range, 34-105) of follow-up, 4 (7.3%) patients had isolated local recurrence, 5 (9%) patients had local recurrence and distant metastases, and 27 (49%) had only distant metastases. Median disease-free survival and overall survival were 13 (range, 4-105) and 19 months (range, 6-105), respectively. In multivariate analysis, nodal stage, AJCC stage and number of lymph nodes dissected were the significant factors affecting disease-free survival whereas Karnofsky performance status was the only significant factor for overall survival. Conclusions. The prognosis for pancreatic cancer remains poor despite adjuvant radiochemotherapy. More aggressive treatments should be considered in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.it
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 567
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postoperative gemcitabine alone and concurrent with radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.
    Demirci, S.
    Ozkok, S.
    Yalman, D.
    Zeytunlu, M.
    Nart, D.
    Yuzer, Y.
    Coker, A.
    Uslu, R.
    Goker, E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [2] Postoperative adjuvant gemcitabine alone and concurrent with radiation after resection of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
    Ozkok, S.
    Dubova, S.
    Yuzer, Y.
    Yalman, D.
    Uslu, R.
    Coker, A.
    Zeytunlu, M.
    Goker, E.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 207 - 208
  • [3] Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Gemcitabine for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Shinoto, Makoto
    Yamada, Shigeru
    Terashima, Kotaro
    Yasuda, Shigeo
    Shioyama, Yoshiyuki
    Honda, Hiroshi
    Kamada, Tadashi
    Tsujii, Hirohiko
    Saisho, Hiromitsu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 498 - 504
  • [4] Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Ma, Yang-Yang
    Leng, Yin
    Xing, Yan-Li
    Li, Hong-Mei
    Chen, Ji-Bing
    Niu, Li-Zhi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2020, 8 (22) : 5564 - 5575
  • [5] Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Yang-Yang Ma
    Yin Leng
    Yan-Li Xing
    Hong-Mei Li
    Ji-Bing Chen
    Li-Zhi Niu
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2020, 8 (22) : 5564 - 5575
  • [6] Gemcitabine concurrent with radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck carcinomas
    Chauhan, Ashok
    Singh, Harmeet
    Sharma, Tejpal
    Manocha, K. K.
    AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2008, 8 (03) : 149 - 155
  • [7] Gemcitabine versus cisplatin concurrent with radiation therapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Mostafa, Magda
    Atif, Hesham
    Fawzy, Mahmoud
    Sakr, Amr Yehia
    Alashwah, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [8] Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Mustafa Cengiz
    Faruk Zorlu
    Suayip Yalcin
    Murat Gurkaynak
    I. Lale Atahan
    Ibrahim H. Gullu
    Medical Oncology, 2007, 24 : 239 - 243
  • [9] Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Cengiz, Mustafa
    Zorlu, Faruk
    Yalcin, Suayip
    Gurkaynak, Murat
    Atahan, I. Lale
    Gullu, Ibrahim H.
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 24 (02) : 239 - 243
  • [10] Radiation therapy in combination with cetuximab and gemcitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Fiore, M.
    Trodella, L.
    Valeri, S.
    Floreno, B.
    Greco, C.
    Nappo, G.
    Molfese, E.
    Trecca, P.
    Coppola, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S72 - S73