Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study

被引:763
|
作者
Froehlich, F
Wietlisbach, V
Gonvers, JJ
Burnand, B
Vader, JP
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, CHUV, PMU, Dept Gastroenterol,Inst Social & Prevent Med, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Gastroenterol, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02776-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The quality of colon cleansing is a major determinant of quality of colonoscopy. To our knowledge, the impact of bowel preparation on the quality of colonoscopy has not been assessed prospectively in a large multicenter study Therefore, this study assessed the factors that determine colon-cleansing quality and the impact of cleansing quality on the technical performance and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy. Methods: Twenty-one centers from 11 countries participated in this prospective observational study. Colon-cleansing quality was assessed on a 5-point scale and was categorized on 3 levels. The clinical indication for colonoscopy, diagnoses, and technical parameters related to colonoscopy were recorded. Results: A total of 5832 patients were included in the study (48.7% men, mean age 57.6 [15.9] years). Cleansing quality was lower in elderly patients and in patients in the hospital. Procedures in poorly prepared patients were longer, more difficult, and more often incomplete. The detection of polyps of any size depended on cleansing quality: odds ratio (OR) 1.73: 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.28, 2.36] for intermediate-quality compared with low-quality preparation; and OR 1.46: 95% CI [1.11, 1.93] for high-quality compared with low-quality preparation. For polyps > 10 mm in size, corresponding ORs were 1.0 for low-quality cleansing, OR 1.83: 95% CI[1.11, 3.05] for intermediate-quality cleansing, and OR 1.72: 95% CI[1.11, 2.67] for high-quality cleansing. Cancers were not detected less frequently in the case of poor preparation. Conclusions: Cleansing quality critically determines quality, difficulty, speed, and completeness of colonoscopy, and is lower in hospitalized patients and patients with higher levels of comorbid conditions. The proportion of patients who undergo polypectomy increases with higher cleansing quality, whereas colon cancer detection does not seem to critically depend on the quality of bowel preparation.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 384
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Impact of colon cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: EPAGE European multicenter study
    Froehlich, F
    Gonvers, JJ
    Vader, JP
    Wietlisbach, V
    Burnand, B
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (05) : AB104 - AB104
  • [2] A European view of appropriateness and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: A multicenter study
    Gonvers, JJ
    Froehlich, F
    Burnand, B
    Vader, JP
    Wietlisbach, V
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 122 (04) : A574 - A574
  • [3] A European view of appropriateness and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: A multicenter study.
    Gonvers, JJ
    Wietlisbach, V
    Vader, JP
    Froehlich, F
    Burnand, B
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 17 : 194 - 194
  • [4] The European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit:: a prospective study
    Balaguer, F
    Llach, J
    Castells, A
    Bordas, JM
    Pellisé, M
    Rodríguez-Moranta, F
    Mata, A
    Fernández-Esparrach, G
    Ginès, A
    Piqué, JM
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 21 (05) : 609 - 613
  • [5] A European view of diagnostic yield and appropriateness of colonoscopy
    Gonvers, Jean-Jacques
    Harris, Jennifer K.
    Wietlisbach, Vincent
    Burnand, Bernard
    Vader, John-Paul
    Froehlich, Florian
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 54 (75) : 729 - 735
  • [7] European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy II guidelines help in selecting and prioritizing patients referred to colonoscopy - a quality control study
    Eskeland, Sigrun Losada
    Dalen, Eirin
    Sponheim, Jon
    Lind, Even
    Brunborg, Cathrine
    de Lange, Thomas
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 49 (04) : 492 - 500
  • [8] The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Project and methods
    Vader, JP
    Burnand, B
    Froehlich, F
    Dubois, RW
    Bochud, M
    Gonvers, JJ
    ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 31 (08) : 572 - 578
  • [9] European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy (EPAGE) - Closing remarks
    Montori, A
    ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 31 (08) : 695 - 695
  • [10] Diagnostic yield of colonoscopy by indication: The EPAGE European multicenter study
    Gonvers, JJ
    Wietlisbach, V
    Burnand, B
    Vader, JP
    Secretan, F
    Froehlich, F
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (05) : AB119 - AB119