Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study

被引:11
|
作者
Winkel, Beatrice [1 ]
Schram, Emma [1 ]
Gremmels, Hendrik [1 ]
Debast, Sylvia [2 ]
Schuurman, Rob [1 ]
Wensing, Annemarie [1 ]
Bonten, Marc [1 ]
Goedhart, Edwin [3 ]
Hofstra, Marije [1 ]
机构
[1] UMC Utrecht, Dept Med Microbiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Isala, Lab Clin Microbiol & Infect Dis, Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands
[3] KNVB, Royal Netherlands Football Assoc, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 10期
关键词
COVID-19; public health; virology; diagnostic microbiology;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048206
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Antigen-based point-of-care tests for identification of SARS-CoV-2 may markedly enhance effectiveness of population-based controlling strategies. Previous studies have demonstrated >70% sensitivity and high specificity compared with reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-PCR) in symptomatic individuals, but test performance for asymptomatic individuals is unknown. Methods Test performance of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test (Abbott) was compared with RT-PCR in a longitudinal cohort study of asymptomatic football players and staff members of professional football clubs. Based on timing of symptoms and prior and subsequent test results, positive RT-PCR tests were categorised as presymptomatic, early or late infection, or persistent RNA shedding. Findings 2425 tests were performed in 824 individuals, of which 52 (6.3%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive based on RT-PCR. There were 2406 paired sets from asymptomatic subjects for analysis. Sixteen Panbio tests were inconclusive, for which sensitivity analyses were performed (considering results as either positive or negative or being excluded). Sensitivity of Panbio for screening of asymptomatic individuals ranged from 80.0% (61.4-92.3) to 86.67% (69.2-96.2) and specificity from 99.53% (95% CI 99.2 to 99.8) to 100% (95% CI 99.8 to 100). Sensitivity of Panbio to detect subjects with presymptomatic/early infection (n=42) ranged from 81.82% (95% CI 67.3 to 91.8) to 90.91% (95% CI 78.3 to 97.5) with specificity always above 99%. Interpretation The Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test identifies 81%-90% of presymptomatic and early asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections with high specificity. This test may therefore be adopted in testing strategies such as targeted screening of specific populations where prevalence is low.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test compared with real-time RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals
    Pena, Monica
    Ampuero, Manuel
    Garces, Carlos
    Gaggero, Aldo
    Garcia, Patricia
    Soledad Velasquez, Maria
    Luza, Ricardo
    Alvarez, Pia
    Paredes, Fabio
    Acevedo, Johanna
    Farfan, Mauricio J.
    Solari, Sandra
    Soto-Rifo, Ricardo
    Valiente-Echeverria, Fernando
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 107 : 201 - 204
  • [2] Comparison Between GenBody COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Kit and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR
    Yi, Tae Hyeon
    Lee, Jong Ho
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2022, 68 (06) : 1291 - 1293
  • [3] Performance evaluation of Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a low prevalence cohort
    Chen, Tse-Hao
    Huang, Ming-Yuan
    Hsiao, Chien-Han
    Chien, Ding-Kuo
    Tsai, Weide
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 54 (12) : 944 - 946
  • [4] Evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device) for SARS-CoV-2 detection in asymptomatic close contacts of COVID-19 patients
    Torres, Ignacio
    Poujois, Sandrine
    Albert, Eliseo
    Colomina, Javier
    Navarro, David
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 (04) : 636.e1 - 636.e4
  • [5] Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Merino, Paloma
    Guinea, Jesus
    Munoz-Gallego, Irene
    Gonzalez-Donapetry, Patricia
    Carlos Galan, Juan
    Antona, Nerea
    Cilla, Gustavo
    Hernaez-Crespo, Silvia
    Luis Diaz-de Tuesta, Jose
    Gual-de Torrella, Ana
    Gonzalez-Romo, Fernando
    Escribano, Pilar
    Angel Sanchez-Castellano, Miguel
    Sota-Busselo, Mercedes
    Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto
    Garcia, Julio
    Canton, Rafael
    Munoz, Patricia
    Dolores Folgueira, Maria
    Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel
    Oteo-Iglesias, Jesus
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 (05) : 758 - 761
  • [6] A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing with realtime RT-PCR among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals
    Jyotsnamayee Sabat
    Subhra Subhadra
    Sonalika Rath
    Lal Mohan Ho
    Tanushree Satpathy
    Dipankar Pattnaik
    Sanghamitra Pati
    Jyotirmayee Turuk
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 23
  • [7] A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing with realtime RT-PCR among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals
    Sabat, Jyotsnamayee
    Subhadra, Subhra
    Rath, Sonalika
    Ho, Lal Mohan
    Satpathy, Tanushree
    Pattnaik, Dipankar
    Pati, Sanghamitra
    Turuk, Jyotirmayee
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [8] Evaluation of the Abbott PanbioTM COVID-19 Ag rapid antigen test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic Canadians
    Shaw, Julie L., V
    Deslandes, Vincent
    Smith, Jennifer
    Desjardins, Marc
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 101 (04)
  • [9] Retrospective analysis of the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection test compared to the reference RT-PCR test
    Bernard, Mathieu
    Cosentino, Gina
    Pieri, Laura
    Zachary, Pierre
    Buser, Michael
    Kbaier, Laurent
    Giannoli, Jean-Marc
    ANNALES DE BIOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 2021, 79 (02) : 168 - 175
  • [10] Real-life validation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) in community-dwelling subjects with symptoms of potential SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Gremmels, Hendrik
    Winkel, Beatrice M. F.
    Schuurman, Rob
    Rosingh, Andert
    Rigter, Nicolette A. M.
    Rodriguez, Olga
    Ubijaan, Johan
    Wensing, Annemarie M. J.
    Bonten, Marc J. M.
    Hofstra, L. Marije
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2021, 31