Compatibility of a Silicone Impression/Adhesive System to FDM-Printed Tray Materials-A Laboratory Peel-off Study

被引：20

作者：

Xu, Yichen ^{[1
]}

Unkovskiy, Alexey ^{[2
,3
]}

Klaue, Felix ^{[1
]}

Rupp, Frank ^{[1
]}

Geis-Gerstorfer, Juergen ^{[1
]}

Spintzyk, Sebastian ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Hosp Tuebingen, Sect Med Mat Sci & Technol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany

[2] Univ Hosp Tuebingen, Dent Sch, Ctr Dent Oral Med & Maxillofacial Surg, Dept Prosthodont, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany

[3] Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, Dept Dent Surg, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya St,19c1, Moscow 119146, Russia

来源：

MATERIALS | 2018年 / 11卷 / 10期

关键词：

additive manufacturing; FDM; custom tray; peel-off strength; surface topography; TENSILE BOND STRENGTH; CUSTOM TRAY; ADHESIVES; DESIGN;

D O I：

10.3390/ma11101905

中图分类号：

O64 [物理化学（理论化学）、化学物理学];

学科分类号：

070304 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

Computer-aided design (CAD) and additive manufacturing (AM) have shown promise in facilitating the fabrication of custom trays. Due to the clinical requirements, custom tray materials should achieve good bonding to the impression/adhesive systems. This study evaluated the retention of three fused deposition modeling (FDM) custom tray materials to a silicone impression/adhesive system before and after gritblasting (GB) by peel-off test. CAD-designed experimental test blocks were printed by FDM using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polyethylene terephthalate glycol copolyester (PETG), and high impact polystyrene (HIPS), and the reference test blocks were made of a conventional light-curing resin (n = 11). Before and after GB, the surface topography of all tray materials was analysed, and the maximum strength of the test block peeled off from a silicone impression/adhesive system was measured. After GB, the arithmetic mean height (Sa) and the valley fluid retention index (Svi) of the four material groups declined (p < 0.05). The peel-off strength of each of the four material groups significantly decreased by GB (p < 0.05), but no statistical difference could be found among them before or after GB. In all peel-off tests, adhesive failure occurred at the adhesive-impression material interface. The results indicated ABS, HIPS, and PETG could provide sufficient adhesion to the adhesive as the conventional light-curing resin, and GB could reduce the roughness generated by FDM and weaken the bonding between the adhesive and the silicone impression.

引用

页数：17