共 50 条
Positive messages may reduce patient pain: A meta-analysis
被引:5
|作者:
Howick, Jeremy
[1
]
Lewith, George
[2
]
Mebius, Alexander
[1
]
Fanshawe, Thomas R.
[1
]
Bishop, Felicity
[8
]
van Osch, Mara
[3
]
van Dulmen, Sandra
[3
,4
,5
]
Christelis, Nick
[6
]
Kaptchuk, Ted
[7
]
Mistiaen, Patriek
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Radcliffe Primary Care Bldg, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
[2] Aldermoor Hlth Ctr, Primary Med Care, Southampton SO16 5ST, Hants, England
[3] NIVEL Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Primary & Community Care, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Buskerud & Vestfold Univ Coll, Fac Hlth Sci, Drammen, Norway
[6] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Australia
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[8] Univ Southampton, Psychol, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
基金:
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词:
Expectations;
Meta-analysis;
Positive messages;
Context factors;
Pain;
Healthcare consultations;
NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS;
TRIALS COMPARING PLACEBO;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
EFFICACY;
INTERVENTIONS;
COMMUNICATION;
HYPERALGESIA;
EXPECTATIONS;
EXPECTANCY;
POWERLESS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.eujim.2017.03.005
中图分类号:
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号:
10 ;
摘要:
Introduction: Current treatments for pain have limited benefits and worrying side effects. Some studies suggest that pain is reduced when clinicians deliver positive messages. However, the effects of positive messages are heterogeneous and have not been subject to meta-analysis. We aimed to estimate the efficacy of positive messages for pain reduction. Methods: We included randomized trials of the effects of positive messages in a subset of the studies included in a recent systematic review of context factors for treating pain. Several electronic databases were searched. Reference lists of relevant studies were also searched. Two authors independently undertook study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and analyses. Our primary outcome measures were differences in patient-or observer-reported pain between groups who were given positive messages and those who were not. Results: Of the 16 randomized trials (1703 patients) that met the inclusion criteria, 12 trials had sufficient data for meta-analysis. The pooled standardized effect size was -0.31 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.61 to -0.01, p = 0.04, I-2 = 82%). The effect size remained positive but not statistically significant after we excluded studies considered to have a high risk of bias (standard effect size - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.54 to 0.19, P = 0.36, I-2 = 84%). Conclusion: Care of patients with chronic or acute pain may be enhanced when clinicians deliver positive messages about possible clinical outcomes. However, we have identified several limitations of the present study that suggest caution when interpreting the results. We recommend further high-quality studies to confirm (or falsify) our result. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 38
页数:8
相关论文