The cloud model based stochastic multi-criteria decision making technology for river health assessment under multiple uncertainties

被引:39
|
作者
Yang, Zhe [1 ]
Wang, Yufeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Water Resources & Environm, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
River health assessment; Cloud model; Stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis; Grey correlation analysis; TOPSIS; Risk analysis information; MATTER-ELEMENT MODEL; FUZZY; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; TOPSIS; CITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124437
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The river health assessment (RHA) usually concerns multiple criteria including streamflow, ecology, physical structure, water quality and social service functions and evaluation standards formulated by managers as well as groups with different interests. Conventional multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) models are used to comprehensively evaluate river condition through multiple criteria under deterministic environment. In fact, uncertainties are always existed in these criteria data since they are correlated with hydrology and water resources system. In this work, we proposed a stochastic cloud model based MCDM framework for solving RHA considering multiple uncertainties in criteria performance values (PVs) and criteria weights (CWs). The cloud model is allied to describe uncertainty of PVs using numerous drops following normal distribution generated by forward drop generator (FDG). The minimum deviation principle based aggregated CWs are utilized to efficiently quantify uncertainty in CWs and reduce conflict between multiple CWs sources. A novel stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) is developed coupling with grey correlation analysis (GCA) and TOPSIS. The risk information for river evaluation caused by multiple uncertainties are described using quantified decision error risk (QDER) and rank uncertainty degree (RUD). The proposed methodology is verified practicability by applying it to river health evaluation in Taihu basin. The numerical simulations are conducted to demonstrate superiority and efficiency of novel SMAA in comparison with conventional SMAA and deterministic MCDM models based on GCA and TOPSIS. The robustness analysis is implemented to disclose its computation stability and reliability as well as effects of cloud parameters on final MCDM results. The results of novel SMAA show that it provides river managers with comprehensive river health and risk analysis information, assisting them to make highly reliable assessment and adopt effective measures harnessing rivers.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating multi-criteria decision-making in health technology assessment
    Kelley, Leah T.
    Egan, Rylan
    Stockley, Denise
    Johnson, Ana P.
    HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (03) : 310 - 317
  • [2] An integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology for health technology assessment
    Karatas, Mumtaz
    Karacan, Ilknur
    Tozan, Hakan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 12 (04) : 504 - 534
  • [3] Farm reorientation assessment model based on multi-criteria decision making
    Nikoloski, Trajce
    Udovc, Andrej
    Pavlovic, Martin
    Rajkovic, Uros
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2017, 140 : 237 - 243
  • [4] A DYNAMIC MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODEL UNDER UNCERTAINTIES
    Bali, Ozkan
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2014, 29 (01): : 131 - 140
  • [5] APPLYING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS (MCDA) AS AN EVIDENCE BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE DECISION MAKING IN EGYPT
    Ashoush, N.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S66 - S66
  • [6] Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainties in composite materials selection and design
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Marchi, Mariapia
    Alam, Syed Bahauddin
    Kavka, Carlos
    Koutsawa, Yao
    Rauchs, Gaston
    Belouettar, Salim
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2022, 279
  • [7] Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainties in composite materials selection and design
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Marchi, Mariapia
    Alam, Syed Bahauddin
    Kavka, Carlos
    Koutsawa, Yao
    Rauchs, Gaston
    Belouettar, Salim
    Composite Structures, 2022, 279
  • [8] Groundwater Assessment Multi-criteria decision making
    Tanti, Kamal Kumar
    Singh, Prashant
    Roy, Swarnendu
    Chetia, Monisha
    Machahary, Ratamali
    Jhariya, Dalchand
    Chanu, Tongbram Malemnganbi
    Bora, Porag
    Gogoi, Priti Rekha
    Sah, Puja
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2020, 118 (05): : 693 - 693
  • [9] Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty in building performance assessment
    Hopfe, Christina J.
    Augenbroe, Godfried L. M.
    Hensen, Jan L. M.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 69 : 81 - 90
  • [10] Multi-criteria decision making for the prioritization of energy systems under uncertainties after life cycle sustainability assessment
    Ren, Jingzheng
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2018, 16 : 45 - 57