Ultrasonic pretreatment and subsequent anaerobic digestion under different operational conditions

被引:96
|
作者
Apul, Onur Guven [1 ]
Sanin, F. Dilek [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Environm Engn, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Biogas; Economical analysis; Pretreatment; Sludge minimization; Ultrasound; WASTE-ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; WATER TREATMENT; DISINTEGRATION; HYDROLYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.128
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In this study ultrasonic pretreatment was investigated in order to improve anaerobic digestion. First, the most effective sonication time was selected during the preliminary studies conducted on waste activated sludge samples. Then the optimal time selected was confirmed running batch anaerobic reactors. In the last part of the experiments, the effect of sonication was investigated for different operational conditions of semi-continuous digesters. Preliminary studies showed 15 min of sonication increased 50 mg/L initial soluble COD concentration up to a value of 2500 mg/L. Batch anaerobic digester results indicated that the increased soluble substrate improved anaerobic biodegradability concurrently, again with the maximal improvement observed for 15 min of sonication. Results from semi-continuous reactors indicated that at SRT of 15 days and OLR of 0.5 kg/m(3) d, ultrasonic pretreatment improved the daily biogas production, methane production and volatile solids reduction significantly when compared to control system. During the operation of reactors at 7.5 days of SRT, pretreatment helped to keep the reactors working. A simple economical analysis of the system was performed using the data obtained during the laboratory study. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8984 / 8992
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of ultrasonic pretreatment under different operational conditions on the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode
    Fernandez-Cegri, V.
    de la Rubia, M. A.
    Raposo, F.
    Borja, R.
    ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 19 (05) : 1003 - 1010
  • [2] EVALUATION OF ULTRASONIC PRETREATMENT ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF DIFFERENT ANIMAL MANURES
    Wu-Haan, W.
    Burns, R. T.
    Moody, L. B.
    Grewell, D.
    Raman, R. D.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2010, 53 (02) : 577 - 583
  • [3] ULTRASONIC PRETREATMENT OF DOGS FOR ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
    Cesaro, A.
    Velten, S.
    Belgiorno, V.
    Kuchta, K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013,
  • [4] Effect of ultrasonic pretreatment subsequent anaerobic co-digestion on naphthalene and pyrene removal
    Tai Ming-qing
    Chen Jie-rong
    Chang Chein-chi
    ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT, 2008, : 637 - 646
  • [5] Optimisation of Microwave, Ultrasonic and Combined Microwave-Ultrasonic Pretreatment Conditions for Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion
    Anteneh Mesfin Yeneneh
    Tushar Kanti Sen
    Ha Ming Ang
    Ahmet Kayaalp
    Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2017, 228
  • [6] Optimisation of Microwave, Ultrasonic and Combined Microwave-Ultrasonic Pretreatment Conditions for Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion
    Yeneneh, Anteneh Mesfin
    Sen, Tushar Kanti
    Ang, Ha Ming
    Kayaalp, Ahmet
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2017, 228 (01):
  • [7] Effect of ultrasonic pretreatment for the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge
    Wei, Na
    ADVANCED RESEARCH ON MATERIAL ENGINEERING, CHEMISTRY, BIOINFORMATICS II, 2012, 531 : 528 - 531
  • [8] Alkaline and ultrasonic pretreatment of sludge before anaerobic digestion
    Chiu, YC
    Chang, CN
    Lin, JG
    Huang, SJ
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 36 (11) : 155 - 162
  • [9] Anaerobic digestion of biorefinery lignin: Effect of different wet explosion pretreatment conditions
    Khan, Muhammad Usman
    Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 298
  • [10] Effect of ultrasonic pretreatment on anaerobic digestion and its sludge dewaterability
    Xu, Huacheng
    He, Pinjing
    Yu, Guanghui
    Shao, Liming
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2011, 23 (09) : 1472 - 1478