GRAPHITE: An Extensible Graph Traversal Framework for Relational Database Management Systems

被引:9
|
作者
Paradies, Marcus [1 ]
Lehner, Wolfgang [1 ]
Bornhovd, Christof [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Database Technol Grp, Dresden, Germany
[2] Risk Management Solut Inc, 7575 Gateway Blvd, Newark, CA 94560 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1145/2791347.2791383
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Graph traversals are a basic but fundamental ingredient for a variety of graph algorithms and graph-oriented queries. To achieve the best possible query performance, they need to be implemented at the core of a database management system that aims at storing, manipulating, and querying graph data. Increasingly, modern business applications demand native graph query and processing capabilities for enterprise-critical operations on data stored in relational database management systems. In this paper we propose an extensible graph traversal framework (GRAPHITE) as a central graph processing component on a common storage engine inside a relational database management system. We study the influence of the graph topology on the execution time of graph traversals and derive two traversal algorithm implementations specialized for different graph topologies and traversal queries. We conduct extensive experiments on GRAPHITE for a large variety of real-world graph data sets and input configurations. Our experiments show that the proposed traversal algorithms differ by up to two orders of magnitude for different input configurations and therefore demonstrate the need for a versatile framework to efficiently process graph traversals on a wide range of different graph topologies and types of queries. Finally, we highlight that the query performance of our traversal implementations is competitive with those of two native graph database management systems.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extensible database management systems
    Carey, Michael
    Haas, Laura
    SIGMOD Record (ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data), 1990, 19 (04): : 54 - 60
  • [2] Which Category Is Better: Benchmarking Relational and Graph Database Management Systems
    Cheng, Yijian
    Ding, Pengjie
    Wang, Tongtong
    Lu, Wei
    Du, Xiaoyong
    DATA SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 4 (04) : 309 - 322
  • [3] Which Category Is Better: Benchmarking Relational and Graph Database Management Systems
    Yijian Cheng
    Pengjie Ding
    Tongtong Wang
    Wei Lu
    Xiaoyong Du
    Data Science and Engineering, 2019, 4 : 309 - 322
  • [4] FlexPref: A Framework for Extensible Preference Evaluation in Database Systems
    Levandoski, Justin J.
    Mokbel, Mohamed F.
    Khalefa, Mohamed E.
    26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING ICDE 2010, 2010, : 828 - 839
  • [5] Directed Graph Representation and Traversal in Relational Databases
    Beydoun, Mohammad
    Haraty, Ramzi A.
    NETWORKED DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, PT 2, 2010, 88 : 443 - 455
  • [6] Cryptography and relational database management systems
    He, JM
    Wang, M
    2001 INTERNATIONAL DATABASE ENGINEERING & APPLICATIONS SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 273 - 284
  • [7] A Comparison of a Graph Database and a Relational Database
    Vicknair, Chad
    Macias, Michael
    Zhao, Zhendong
    Nan, Xiaofei
    Chen, Yixin
    Wilkins, Dawn
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 48TH ANNUAL SOUTHEAST REGIONAL CONFERENCE (ACM SE 10), 2010, : 223 - 228
  • [8] DEVELOPMENT OF A RELATIONAL DATABASE FOR LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
    Deperlioglu, Omer
    Sarpkaya, Yilmaz
    Ergun, Ertugrul
    TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 10 (04): : 107 - 120
  • [9] AN IMPLEMENTATION OF BITEMPORAL RELATIONAL DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
    Atay, Canon Eren
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2014, 20 (02): : 54 - 62
  • [10] BUFFER MANAGEMENT IN RELATIONAL DATABASE-SYSTEMS
    SACCO, GM
    SCHKOLNICK, M
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON DATABASE SYSTEMS, 1986, 11 (04): : 473 - 498