Value of concentration and gene methylation analyses of circulating cell-free DNA as diagnostic method for breast cancer: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Xiao [1 ]
Huang, Junming [2 ]
Zhang, Kun [3 ]
Yu, Yinghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, 71 Hedi Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Panyu Hosp Chinese Med, Dept Oncol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Yantai, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE | 2018年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
Breast neoplasms; circulating cell-free DNA; concentration; methy at on; meta-analysis; PROMOTER METHYLATION; ODDS RATIO; TUMOR DNA; PLASMA; SERUM; HYPERMETHYLATION; METASTASIS; CARCINOMA; ACCURACY; MARKER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Many studies focus attention on circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration and methylation as means for early detection of breast cancer. However, the results of existing studies are different and it remains difficult to determine the diagnostic role of circulating cfDNA in breast cancer. Therefore, this study performed a meta-analysis to integrate the findings of these published studies and establish the diagnostic value of circulating cfDNA in diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: A total of 19 studies were included and divided into three subgroups. Sensitivity, specificity, and other important measures of cfDNA accuracy for breast cancer diagnosis were pooled using random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques were used to summarize overall accuracy. Results: Summary estimates for cfDNA concentration and gene methylation in diagnosis of breast cancer were as follows: in the subgroup of quantitative analysis, sensitivity and specificity were 0.889 (95%CI = 0.858-0.915) and 0.806 (95%CI = 0.767-0.841); PLR was 5.058 (95%Cl = 2.723-9.392); NLR was 0.150 (95% CI = 0.090-0.251) and DOR value was 42.156 (95% CI = 19.364-91.774). In the subgroup of single-gene indicators, sensitivity and specificity were 0.406 (95%CI = 0.390-0.421) and 0.848 (95% CI = 0.836-0.860); PLR was 4.569 (95% CI = 3.329-6.270); NLR was 0.643 (95% CI = 0.588-0.704) and DOR value was 8.608 (95% CI = 5.679-13.046). In the subgroup of multiple-gene panel, sensitivity and specificity were 0.778 (95% CI = 0.760-0.796) and 0.835 (95% CI = 0.819-0.850); PLR was 6.158 (95% CI = 4.432-8.556); NLR was 0.194 (95% CI = 0.139-0.272) and DOR value was 39.353 (95% CI = 21.139-73.260). Conclusion: Circulating cfDNA concentration and gene methylation analysis might be applied in breast cancer detection since the test has a relatively high level of diagnostic accuracy. If only the single-gene methylation detection assay is used for breast cancer diagnosis, extra caution should be applied. Evaluation of circulating cfDNA concentration and multiple-gene methylation analyses might improve breast cancer early diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:7519 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic Value of Concentration of Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Yu, Dandan
    Tong, Yan
    Guo, Xinnian
    Feng, Lingfang
    Jiang, Zhaoqiang
    Ying, Shibo
    Jia, Junlin
    Fang, Yuan
    Yu, Min
    Xia, Hailing
    Shi, Li
    Lou, Jianlin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [2] Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Vymetalkova, Veronika
    Cervena, Klara
    Bartu, Linda
    Vodicka, Pavel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2018, 19 (11)
  • [3] Cell-free Circulating DNA: Diagnostic Value in Patients with Renal Cell Cancer
    Hauser, Stefan
    Zahalka, Tobias
    Ellinger, Joerg
    Fechner, Guido
    Heukamp, Lukas C.
    Von Ruecker, Alexander
    Mueller, Stefan C.
    Bastian, Patrick J.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (07) : 2785 - 2789
  • [4] Liquid biopsies:DNA methylation analyses in circulating cell-free DNA
    Hu Zeng
    Bo He
    Chengqi Yi
    Jinying Peng
    JournalofGeneticsandGenomics, 2018, 45 (04) : 185 - 192
  • [5] Liquid biopsies: DNA methylation analyses in circulating cell-free DNA
    Zeng, Hu
    He, Bo
    Yi, Chengqi
    Peng, Jinying
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 185 - 192
  • [6] Methylation of cell-free circulating DNA in the diagnosis of cancer
    Warton, Kristina
    Samimi, Goli
    FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES, 2015, 2
  • [7] A Sight of the Diagnostic Value of Aberrant Cell-Free DNA Methylation in Lung Cancer
    Zhao, Hui
    Zhang, Hui
    Xu, Wei
    Wen, Baiqing
    Kang, Yani
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2022, 2022
  • [8] Value of circulating cell-free DNA analysis as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Lin, Ziqiang
    Neiswender, James
    Fang, Bin
    Ma, Xuelei
    Zhang, Jing
    Hu, Xiuying
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (16) : 26625 - 26636
  • [9] Diagnostic Value of Circulating Cell-free DNA in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer
    Klimaite, Raimonda
    Kazokaite, Mintaute
    Kondrotiene, Aiste
    Dauksiene, Dalia
    Verkauskiene, Rasa
    Zilaitiene, Birute
    Dauksa, Albertas
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (05) : 2289 - 2299
  • [10] Cell-Free Circulating DNA: Diagnostic Value in Patients With Testicular Germ Cell Cancer
    Ellinger, Joerg
    Wittkarnp, Volker
    Albers, Peter
    Perabo, Frank G. E.
    Mueller, Stefan C.
    von Ruecker, Alexander
    Bastian, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (01): : 363 - 371