Agroecological and social characteristics of New York city community gardens: contributions to urban food security, ecosystem services, and environmental education

被引:65
|
作者
Gregory, Megan M. [1 ,3 ]
Leslie, Timothy W. [2 ]
Drinkwater, Laurie E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Hort, 134A Plant Sci Bldg, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[2] Long Isl Univ, Dept Biol, 801M,1 Univ Plaza, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA
[3] Forsyth Cty Cooperat Extens, 1450 Fairchild Rd, Winston Salem, NC 27105 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国农业部;
关键词
Community gardens; Ecological knowledge; Ecosystem services; Food security; Gardening education; Insect pest management; Land-use; New York City; Soil fertility; Soil quality; Urban agriculture; Urban arthropods; ORGANIC-MATTER FRACTIONS; TETRANYCHUS-URTICAE; VEGETABLE INTAKE; NATURAL ENEMIES; CROP-ROTATION; COVER CROPS; MANAGEMENT; BENEFITS; SYSTEMS; TOMATO;
D O I
10.1007/s11252-015-0505-1
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
There is growing public interest and participation in food-producing urban community gardens in North America, yet little research has examined agricultural production and ecological processes in these spaces. We describe the agroecological and social characteristics of 61 food-producing gardens in New York City, drawing on gardener interviews, land-use maps, plant species inventories, arthropod scouting, and soil sampling and analysis. Gardens contained agricultural crops, food production infrastructure, ornamental plants, and recreational areas in varying proportions, indicating that gardens serve multiple and distinct purposes depending on community needs and interests. On average, gardeners devoted the greatest proportion of garden area (44 %) to food production, and supplied a large share of their households' produce needs from their community gardens. Solanaceae, Brassicaceae, and Cucurbitaceae crops dominated food crop areas, hindering effective crop rotation to prevent disease and pest problems. Most gardeners grew crops in raised beds constructed with clean fill and compost. These soils generally had sandy textures, low water-holding capacity, high organic matter levels (with a large proportion from recent inputs) and excessive nutrient levels. Soil water content at field capacity increased exponentially with total soil carbon, suggesting that organic matter enhances water-holding capacity. Insect pest densities greatly exceeded action thresholds in nearly all gardens for aphids and whiteflies on Brassica crops, aphids on Cucurbit crops, and two-spotted spider mites on tomatoes. Predator and parasitoid densities were generally low (less than one per plant on average), perhaps partially due to low floral and woody perennial cover in most gardens (12 % and 9 % on average, respectively). Dominant groups of natural enemies were minute pirate bugs, spiders, and parasitoid wasps. A wide variety of people of differing experience levels, incomes, and ethnicities participate in community gardening in NYC, and most gardens host multiple languages. Promising directions for urban gardening research, education, and practice include: 1) Cover cropping to improve soil quality and nutrient management, and diversify crop rotations; 2) Improving access to soil testing and guidance on appropriate use of soil amendments, 3) Enhancing habitat for arthropod natural enemies that provide biological control of insect pests with floral and woody perennial plantings; and 4) Incorporating ecological knowledge and inquiry-based approaches into gardening workshops, educational materials, and technical support, and offering these resources in multiple languages.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 794
页数:32
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Agroecological and social characteristics of New York city community gardens: contributions to urban food security, ecosystem services, and environmental education
    Megan M. Gregory
    Timothy W. Leslie
    Laurie E. Drinkwater
    Urban Ecosystems, 2016, 19 : 763 - 794
  • [2] The experience of community urban gardens: Social organization and food security
    de Souza, Joeli Silva
    Vieira Cardoso, Ryzia de Cassia
    Arlego Paraguassu, Lidice Almeida
    dos Santos, Sidione Ferreira
    REVISTA DE NUTRICAO-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2019, 32
  • [3] Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City
    Connolly, James J.
    Svendsen, Erika S.
    Fisher, Dana R.
    Campbell, Lindsay K.
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2013, 109 (01) : 76 - 84
  • [4] Networked governance and the management of ecosystem services: The case of urban environmental stewardship in New York City
    Connolly, James J. T.
    Svendsen, Erika S.
    Fisher, Dana R.
    Campbell, Lindsay K.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 10 : 187 - 194
  • [5] Urban gardens and poverty: Analysis on the example of the community gardens in the South Bronx of New York city
    Mees, Carolin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HORTICULTURAL PLANTS IN URBAN AND PERI-URBAN LIFE, 2007, (762): : 205 - 220
  • [6] Urban Ecosystem Services for Resilience Planning and Management in New York City
    McPhearson, Timon
    Hamstead, Zoe A.
    Kremer, Peleg
    AMBIO, 2014, 43 (04) : 502 - 515
  • [7] Urban Ecosystem Services for Resilience Planning and Management in New York City
    Timon McPhearson
    Zoé A. Hamstead
    Peleg Kremer
    AMBIO, 2014, 43 : 502 - 515
  • [8] Urban Community Environmental Health Assessment: New York City
    Kinney, P.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (06) : S60 - S61
  • [9] Mapping ecosystem services in New York City: Applying a social-ecological approach in urban vacant land
    McPhearson, Timon
    Kremer, Peleg
    Hamstead, Zoe A.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 : E11 - E26
  • [10] Holistic valuation of urban ecosystem services in New York City's Central Park
    Sutton, Paul C.
    Anderson, Sharolyn J.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 19 : 87 - 91