Calibrating chemical multisensory devices for real world applications: An in-depth comparison of quantitative machine learning approaches

被引:79
|
作者
De Vito, S. [1 ]
Esposito, E. [1 ]
Salvato, M. [1 ]
Popoola, O. [2 ]
Formisano, F. [1 ]
Jones, R. [2 ]
Di Francia, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] ENEA Italian Agcy New Technol Energy & Sustainabl, Photovolta & Smart Network Div DTE FSN DIN, Ple E Fermi 1, I-80055 Portici, NA, Italy
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Chem, Lensfield Rd, Cambridge CB2 1EW, England
关键词
Distributed chemical sensing; Multisensors calibration algorithms; Dynamic machine learning; Air quality monitoring; Indicative measurements; Internet of Things; ELECTRONIC NOSE; NEURAL-NETWORK; MONITORING APPLICATIONS; GAS CONCENTRATIONS; FIELD CALIBRATION; SENSING SYSTEMS; SENSOR ARRAYS; AIR; OLFACTION; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.snb.2017.07.155
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Chemical multisensor devices need calibration algorithms to estimate gas concentrations. Their possible adoption as indicative air quality measurements devices poses new challenges due to the need to operate in continuous monitoring modes in uncontrolled environments. Several issues, including slow dynamics, continue to affect their real world performances. At the same time, the need for estimating pollutant concentrations on board the devices, especially for wearables and IoT deployments, is becoming highly desirable. In this framework, several calibration approaches have been proposed and tested on a variety of proprietary devices and datasets; still, no thorough comparison is available to researchers. This work attempts a benchmarking of the most promising calibration algorithms according to recent literature with a focus on machine learning approaches. We test the techniques against absolute and dynamic performances, generalization capabilities and computational/storage needs using three different datasets sharing continuous monitoring operation methodology. Our results can guide researchers and engineers in the choice of optimal strategy. They show that non-linear multivariate techniques yield reproducible results, outperforming linear approaches. Specifically, the Support Vector Regression method consistently shows good performances in all the considered scenarios. We highlight the enhanced suitability of shallow neural networks in a trade-off between performance and computational/storage needs. We confirm, on a much wider basis, the advantages of dynamic approaches with respect to static ones that only rely on instantaneous sensor array response. The latter have been shown to be best choice whenever prompt and precise response is needed. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1210
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Calibrating machine learning approaches for probability estimation: A comprehensive comparison
    Ojeda, Francisco M.
    Jansen, Max L.
    Thiery, Alexandre
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    Weimar, Christian
    Schmid, Matthias
    Ziegler, Andreas
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (29) : 5451 - 5478
  • [2] In-depth Comparative Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Approaches for Detection of Cybersecurity Threats
    D'hooge, Laurens
    Wauters, Tim
    Volckaert, Bruno
    De Turck, Filip
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS, BIG DATA AND SECURITY (IOTBDS 2019), 2019, : 125 - 136
  • [3] Challenges for real-world applications of nonintrusive load monitoring and opportunities for machine learning approaches
    Yan, Lei
    Sheikholeslami, Mehrdad
    Gong, Wenlong
    Tian, Wei
    Li, Zuyi
    ELECTRICITY JOURNAL, 2022, 35 (05):
  • [4] Machine Learning and Time Series: Real World Applications
    Misra, Puneet
    Siddharth
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND AUTOMATION (ICCCA), 2017, : 389 - 394
  • [5] Comparison and assessment of machine learning approaches in manufacturing applications
    K. Ramesh
    M. N. Indrajith
    Y. S. Prasanna
    Sandip S. Deshmukh
    Chandu Parimi
    Tathagata Ray
    Industrial Artificial Intelligence, 3 (1):
  • [6] AN ACCESSIBLE COMPARISON OF TRADITIONAL STATISTICAL AND MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES TO ANALYSIS OF REAL WORLD DATA: WHICH, WHEN AND WHY?
    Merinopoulou, E.
    Oguz, M.
    Chu, B. C.
    McDonald, L.
    Ulvestad, M.
    Cox, A.
    Ramagopalan, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A770 - A770
  • [7] Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions
    Sarker I.H.
    SN Computer Science, 2021, 2 (3)
  • [8] Foreword of the Special Issue on Real-World Applications of Machine Learning
    Rizvi, Syed Tahir Hussain
    Arif, Arslan
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [9] A Review on Machine Learning Strategies for Real-World Engineering Applications
    Jhaveri, Rutvij H.
    Revathi, A.
    Ramana, Kadiyala
    Raut, Roshani
    Dhanaraj, Rajesh Kumar
    MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 2022
  • [10] Machine Learning Approaches for Real-Time Mineral Classification and Educational Applications
    Tsangaratos, Paraskevas
    Ilia, Ioanna
    Spanoudakis, Nikolaos
    Karageorgiou, Georgios
    Perraki, Maria
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (04):