共 50 条
Ambulatory glucose profile analysis of the juvenile diabetes research foundation continuous glucose monitoring dataset-Applications to the pediatric diabetes population
被引:19
|作者:
Forlenza, Gregory P.
[1
]
Pyle, Laura L.
[2
,3
]
Maahs, David M.
[1
]
Dunn, Timothy C.
[4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Colorado, Barbara Davis Ctr, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Pediat, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Biostat & Informat, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[4] Abbott Diabet Care, Alameda, CA USA
关键词:
ambulatory glucose profile;
continuous glucose monitor;
diabetes;
GLYCEMIC CONTROL;
T1D EXCHANGE;
HEMOGLOBIN A1C;
CLINICAL CARE;
PUMP THERAPY;
MANAGEMENT;
CHILDREN;
ADOLESCENTS;
HYPOGLYCEMIA;
D O I:
10.1111/pedi.12474
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: Increased continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use presents both the benefit and burden of increased data for clinicians to rapidly analyze. The ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) is an evolving a universal software report for CGM data analysis. Objectives/Hypotheses: We utilized the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation-CGM dataset to evaluate the AGP across a broad spectrum of patients to show how AGP can be used clinically to assist with CGM-related decision making. We hypothesized that AGP metrics would be different across age and HbA1c strata. Subjects: AGPs were generated from the JDRF-CGM trial dataset for all periods during which there were = 10 days of CGM coverage in the 2 weeks adjacent to an HbA1c measurement yielding 1101 AGPs for 393 unique subjects. Methods: AGPs were stratified by age group (8-14, 15-24, and = 25 years) and HbA1c (within or above target for age) and compared for between group differences in AGP metrics via two-factor ANOVA. Glycemic differences between time periods were analyzed via segmented regression analysis. Results: Glucose exposure (average and estimated A1c) and variability (standard deviation and interquartile range) were different between the low and high HbA1c levels. Within a given HbA1c level all age groups were significantly different from each other with older patients having lower averages with less variability than younger patients. Conclusions: AGP analysis of the JDRF-CGM data highlights significant differences in glycemic profiles between pediatric and adult age groups and between well and less well-controlled patient populations.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 628
页数:7
相关论文