What determines household cooking fuel preferences? Empirical evidence from South Korea

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Chan Hee [1 ]
Hong, Jong Ho [1 ]
Kang, Sung Hoon [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Environm Studies, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Policy Studies, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Hanyang Univ, Dept Policy Studies, 509 Multidisciplinary Lect Hall,Wangsimni Ro 222, Seoul 04763, South Korea
关键词
Fuel-switching; energy choice; electric stove; electrification; energy ladder; energy stacking; RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS; ENERGY CHOICE; LUNG-FUNCTION; GAS; SUBSTITUTION; ASSOCIATION; CONSUMPTION; PARADIGM;
D O I
10.1177/0958305X221139925
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examines the determinants of modern cooking fuel choices in Korea. The ordered probit model is estimated using an extensive online survey of Korean household energy consumers. Our empirical results showed that age, gender, and education are significant determinants of modern cooking fuel choices among the socioeconomic demographic variables: females, older people, and highly educated people are more likely to prefer electricity. Also, electricity is more likely to be preferred over natural gas by people who have a higher preference for district heating. Two psychological factors significantly influence cooking fuel choices. People whose behaviors are environment-friendly and people who are more health-conscious are more likely to prefer electricity over natural gas or propane. There are three important insights into the cooking fuel transition toward electricity. First, as interest in health and climate change has significantly increased in recent years in Korea, it may stimulate the transition from natural gas or propane to electricity. Second, electrification of cooking methods will be beneficial for the environment if electricity generation becomes less carbon-intensive. Since electricity in Korea is mainly generated by fossil fuels, it is crucial to implement more aggressive policies toward renewable sources in the energy mix for electricity generation. Third, the public should better understand why this problem cannot be overlooked because the energy mix is important in mitigating climate change. The better the people understand the exact relationship between energy consumption and pollutant emissions, the more effective and environmentally sound will the energy mix policy become.
引用
收藏
页码:1270 / 1287
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can Digital Economy Facilitate Household Clean Cooking Fuel Transition? Empirical Evidence from China
    Dai, Xiaofang
    Zhang, Zhenhua
    Gan, Weiming
    Fan, Dongshou
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [2] Household cooking fuel choice: Evidence from the Republic of Benin
    Lokonon, Boris Odilon Kounagbe
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-REVUE AFRICAINE DE DEVELOPPEMENT, 2020, 32 (04): : 686 - 698
  • [3] What Makes Employees Behave Innovatively? Empirical Evidence from South Korea
    Lee, Sora
    Yoo, Jaewon
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [4] Sustainable Assets and Strategies Affecting the Forestry Household Income: Empirical Evidence from South Korea
    Jo, Jang-Hwan
    Roh, Taewoo
    Shin, Seunguk
    Youn, Yeo-Chang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (13)
  • [5] What are the drivers of sustainable energy transition? Insights from an empirical analysis of household preferences for electric induction cooking in Nepal
    Paudel, Jeevan
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    Khan, Ghulam Dastgir
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 417
  • [6] What Drives Socially Responsible Design in Organizations?: Empirical Evidence from South Korea
    Koo, Yoori
    Cooper, Rachel
    DESIGN JOURNAL, 2016, 19 (06): : 879 - 901
  • [7] The determinants of household cooking fuel transition: evidence from rural India
    Barik, Namrata
    Padhi, Puja
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [8] Uncertainty and household portfolio choice : Evidence from South Korea
    Park, Jin Seok
    Suh, Donghyun
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2019, 180 : 21 - 24
  • [9] Cooking fuel preferences among Ghanaian Households: An empirical analysis
    Karimu, Amin
    ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 27 : 10 - 17
  • [10] What determines preferences for an electoral system? Evidence from a binding referendum
    Guillem Riambau
    Steven Stillman
    Geua Boe-Gibson
    Public Choice, 2021, 186 : 179 - 208