The relationship between pollution abatement costs and environmental regulation: Evidence from the Chinese industrial sector

被引:13
|
作者
Shimizu, Masayuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ryukyus, Fac Global & Reg Studies, 1 Senbaru, Nishihara, Okinawa 9030213, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
China; directional distance function; environmental efficiency; environmental regulation; pollution abatement costs; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; KUZNETS CURVE; DISTANCE FUNCTION; PANEL-DATA; EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTIVITY; OECD; COINTEGRATION; EMISSIONS; OUTPUTS;
D O I
10.1111/rode.12655
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Since the 2000s, China has been trying to strengthen emission controls in response to increasing pollution problems. However, strict implementation of emission controls generates pollution abatement costs. Using regional data for 29 provinces in the Chinese industrial sector from 1995 to 2010, this study estimated the pollution abatement costs for each province through the measurement of environmental efficiency, by applying a directional distance function approach. Moreover, using panel data analysis, this study clarified whether there is a nonlinear relationship between pollution abatement costs and environmental regulations. The empirical results are as follows. The study confirmed that the burden of abatement costs tended not only to occur in the central and western regions but also to increase in the eastern region. Moreover, the nonlinear relationship is inverted U-shaped; thus, pollution abatement costs increase, as a negative effect of environmental regulations, until a certain inflection point, after which they decrease.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 690
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of pollution abatement activities on environmental efficiency and productivity: Empirical evidence from the Chinese industrial sector
    Shimizu, Masayuki
    REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2022, 26 (01) : 484 - 509
  • [2] Environmental taxes, environmental outsourcing, and pollution abatement: Evidence from Chinese industrial sewage discharge enterprises
    Wang, Qianqian
    Sun, Xinmeng
    Xiong, Haoyang
    Wang, Qi
    Zhang, Bing
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 133
  • [3] Assessing the impact of environmental regulation on pollution abatement and collaborative emissions reduction: Micro-evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises
    Du, Weijian
    Li, Mengjie
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 82
  • [4] Industrial Robots and Environmental Pollution: Evidence From Chinese Cities
    Lu, Wenjuan
    Mao, Shenya
    Qiu, Xinfeng
    Yan, Chenjing
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2025,
  • [5] Abatement costs of combatting industrial water pollution: convergence across Chinese provinces
    Xie, Huiming
    Wang, Xiaopeng
    Shen, Manhong
    Wei, Chu
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (09) : 10752 - 10767
  • [6] Abatement costs of combatting industrial water pollution: convergence across Chinese provinces
    Huiming Xie
    Xiaopeng Wang
    Manhong Shen
    Chu Wei
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 10752 - 10767
  • [7] Pollution regulation and abatement efforts: evidence from China
    Wang, H
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 41 (01) : 85 - 94
  • [8] Do environmental regulation policies increase urban boundary pollution? Micro evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises
    Wang, Hongcheng
    Li, Linfei
    Xu, Xin
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 106
  • [9] Pollution Emissions, Environmental Policy, and Marginal Abatement Costs
    He, Ling-Yun
    Ou, Jia-Jia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (12)
  • [10] How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data
    Ouyang, Xiaoling
    Li, Qiong
    Du, Kerui
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 139