Inclusiveness in decision making and avoiding unnecessary costs for successful decision making

被引:2
|
作者
Selim, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bahrain, Dept Econ & Finance, Coll Business Adm, Sakhir, Bahrain
关键词
Inclusiveness in decision making; consensus; harmony and social cohesion; unity; Correct decision making; Economic prosperity;
D O I
10.1109/DASA53625.2021.9682247
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to examine the effects of inclusiveness in decision making on the costs of decision making and its implementation. This study is based on multiple regression model and the individual effects of each of the explanatory variables will be evaluated by applying partial derivatives. The findings of this study suggest that inclusiveness in decision making brings unity, cohesion, and team spirit and thus reduces the cost of correct decision making and its implementation. In addition, if decisions are made on the basis of consensus of all stakeholders as well as the employees, the cost of correct decision making will decrease, and it is most likely that correct decisions will be made because of the consensus and presence of democratic institutions. Listening to the practitioners and seeking expert advice may also reduce cost and it is most likely that correct decisions will be made. Maintaining goodwill and harmony will also promote cooperative attitudes and thus will reduce the cost of correct decision making and its implementation. Empowering, honoring, providing incentive bonus and recognizing the great contributions of the employees will truly motivate the employees and cost of decision making will decline and most likely correct decisions will be made which will eventually place the firm or the corporation or the state on the road to success and prosperity. This study will be immensely useful to decision makers, top managers in private and public enterprises, policy makers, research scholars, and academicians across the globe.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Annals Clinical Decision Making: Avoiding Cognitive Errors in Clinical Decision Making
    Restrepo, Daniel
    Armstrong, Katrina A.
    Metlay, Joshua P.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 172 (11) : 747 - +
  • [2] DECISION-MAKING COSTS
    WILBERDI.EC
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1968, 19 (02): : R12 - &
  • [3] COSTS OF DECISION-MAKING
    MICHALOS, AC
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 1970, 9 (FAL) : 39 - 51
  • [4] COSTS AND DECISION-MAKING
    WIMPENNY, JC
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 80 (789): : 402 - 410
  • [5] Avoiding Cognitive Errors in Clinical Decision Making
    Musher, Daniel M.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 173 (08) : 679 - 679
  • [6] IMPUTED COSTS IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS
    Porubsky, Peter
    AKTUALNE PROBLEMY PODNIKOVEJ SFERY 2014, 2014, : 417 - 421
  • [7] Sampling: the impact on costs and decision making
    Minnitt, R. C. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY, 2007, 107 (07): : 451 - 462
  • [8] RELEVANT COSTS AND DECISION MAKING OF INVESTMENT
    Ruliana, Titin
    Soegiarto, Eddy K.
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 15 (04) : 279 - 286
  • [9] COSTS AND DECISION-MAKING IN ICU
    BENDIXEN, HH
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 25 : 33 - 33
  • [10] Avoiding Decision Fatigue Potential with AI-Assisted Decision-Making
    Echterhoff, Jessica Maria
    Melkote, Aditya
    Kancherla, Sujen
    McAuley, Julian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 32ND ACM CONFERENCE ON USER MODELING, ADAPTATION AND PERSONALIZATION, UMAP 2024, 2024, : 1 - 11