Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis in the Russian Federation in 1998-2014

被引:6
|
作者
Ivanova, Olga E. [1 ,2 ]
Eremeeva, Tatyana P. [1 ]
Morozova, Nadezhda S. [3 ]
Shakaryan, Armen K. [1 ,4 ]
Korotkova, Ekaterina A. [1 ,5 ]
Kozlovskaya, Liubov, I [1 ,2 ]
Baykova, Olga Y. [1 ]
Krasota, Alexandr Y. [1 ,5 ]
Gmyl, Anatoly P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, FSBSI Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS, Chumakov Fed Sci Ctr Res & Dev Immune & Biol Prod, Inst Poliomyelit & Viral Encephalitides, Moscow 108819, Russia
[2] Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, Moscow 119991, Russia
[3] Russian Fed Serv Surveillance Consumer Rights Pro, Fed Ctr Hyg & Epidemiol, Moscow 117105, Russia
[4] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Moscow 117997, Russia
[5] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, AN Belozersky Inst Phys Chem Biol, Moscow 119899, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Poliomyelitis; VAPP; Poliovirus vaccine; IPV; OPV; INACTIVATED POLIOVIRUS VACCINE; ERADICATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; SURVEILLANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2018.08.017
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: Different polio vaccination schemes have been used in Russia: oral polio vaccine (OPV) was used in 1998-2007 and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) followed by OPV in 2008-2014. This article presents the characteristics of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) cases in Russia during this period. Methods: VAPP cases were identified through the acute flaccid paralysis surveillance system, classified by the National Expert Classification Committee. Criteria for a 'recipient VAPP' (rVAPP) case were poliomyelitis symptoms 6-30 days a(f)ter OPV administration, isolation of the vaccine virus, and residual paralysis 60 days after disease onset. Unvaccinated cases with a similar picture 6-60 days after contact with an OPV recipient were classified as 'contact VAPP' (cVAPP) cases. Results: During 1998-2014, 127 VAPP cases were registered: 82 rVAPP and 45 cVAPP. During the period in which only OPV was used, rVAPP cases prevailed (73.8%); cases of rVAPP were reduced during the sequential scheme period (15%). Poliovirus type 3 (39.5%) and type 2 (23.7%) were isolated more often. Vaccine-derived poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 were isolated from three cases of cVAPP. The incidence of VAPP cases was higher during the period of OPV use (1 case/1.59 million OPV doses) than during the sequential scheme period (1 case/4.18 million doses). Conclusion: The risk of VAPP exists if OPV remains in the vaccination schedule. (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 69
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VACCINE-ASSOCIATED PARALYTIC POLIOMYELITIS
    MERMEL, L
    DEMORA, DS
    SUTTER, RW
    PALLANSCH, MA
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (11): : 810 - 811
  • [2] VACCINE-ASSOCIATED PARALYTIC POLIOMYELITIS
    BEAUSOLEIL, JL
    NORDGREN, RE
    MODLIN, JF
    JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 1994, 9 (03) : 334 - 335
  • [3] Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
    Sepkowitz, S
    PEDIATRICS, 1997, 99 (01) : 145 - 145
  • [4] Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
    Ambler, Z
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2000, 63 (01) : 50 - 52
  • [5] Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
    Sullivan, AA
    Boyle, RS
    Whitby, RM
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1995, 163 (08) : 423 - 424
  • [6] Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
    Firus, C
    Sick, W
    AKTUELLE NEUROLOGIE, 1998, 25 (01) : 29 - 30
  • [7] Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
    Catton, M
    Brussen, KA
    Kennett, M
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1996, 164 (04) : 255 - 256
  • [8] Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis in Japan
    Hosoda, Miwako
    Inoue, Hajime
    Miyazawa, Yasuo
    Kusumi, Eiji
    Shibuya, Kenji
    LANCET, 2012, 379 (9815): : 520 - 520
  • [9] Imported vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
    Cain, Joanna E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2006, 106 (06) : 21 - 21
  • [10] Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis - Reply
    Sullivan, AA
    Boyle, RS
    Whitby, RM
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1996, 164 (04) : 256 - 256