A Closed-Form Technique for the Reliability and Risk Assessment of Wind Turbine Systems

被引:13
|
作者
Mensah, Akwasi F. [1 ]
Duenas-Osorio, Leonardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77251 USA
来源
ENERGIES | 2012年 / 5卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
wind turbine; system reliability; closed-form solutions; consequence analysis; risk; MAINTENANCE; OPERATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.3390/en5061734
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a closed-form method to evaluate wind turbine system reliability and associated failure consequences. Monte Carlo simulation, a widely used approach for system reliability assessment, usually requires large numbers of computational experiments, while existing analytical methods are limited to simple system event configurations with a focus on average values of reliability metrics. By analyzing a wind turbine system and its components in a combinatorial yet computationally efficient form, the proposed approach provides an entire probability distribution of system failure that contains all possible configurations of component failure and survival events. The approach is also capable of handling unique component attributes such as downtime and repair cost needed for risk estimations, and enables sensitivity analysis for quantifying the criticality of individual components to wind turbine system reliability. Applications of the technique are illustrated by assessing the reliability of a 12-subassembly turbine system. In addition, component downtimes and repair costs of components are embedded in the formulation to compute expected annual wind turbine unavailability and repair cost probabilities, and component importance metrics useful for maintenance planning and research prioritization. Furthermore, this paper introduces a recursive solution to closed-form method and applies this to a 45-component turbine system. The proposed approach proves to be computationally efficient and yields vital reliability information that could be readily used by wind farm stakeholders for decision making and risk management.
引用
收藏
页码:1734 / 1750
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A compact, closed-form solution for the optimum, ideal wind turbine
    Peters, David A.
    Modarres, Ramin
    WIND ENERGY, 2014, 17 (04) : 589 - 603
  • [2] Closed-Form Solution of Fundamental Frequency of Steel-Concrete Hybrid Wind Turbine Tower
    Li, Shou-Zhen
    Zhou, Xu-Hong
    Wang, Yu-Hang
    Gan, Dan
    Deng, Xiao-Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2023, 23 (03)
  • [3] A Closed-Form Alternative for Estimating ω Reliability under Unidimensionality
    Hancock, Gregory R.
    An, Ji
    MEASUREMENT-INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 18 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [4] CLOSED-FORM ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF DAMPED SYSTEMS
    KUMAR, K
    MODI, VJ
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 1974, 78 (761): : 209 - 211
  • [5] Infinite number of closed-form solutions for reliability of inhomogeneous beams
    Candan, S
    Elishakoff, I
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY, VOLS 1 AND 2: CIVIL ENGINEERING RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS, 2000, : 1059 - 1067
  • [6] CLOSED-FORM RELIABILITY EXPRESSION OF LARGE NONHOMOGENEOUS DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM
    NOORE, A
    NESTOR, SB
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 1990, 14 : 196 - 199
  • [7] Beyond MTTDL: A Closed-Form RAID 6 Reliability Equation
    Elerath, Jon G.
    Schindler, Jiri
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON STORAGE, 2014, 10 (02)
  • [8] Closed-form aftershock reliability of damage-cumulating elastic-perfectly-plastic systems
    Iervolino, Iunio
    Giorgio, Massimiliano
    Chioccarelli, Eugenio
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (04): : 613 - 625
  • [9] An assessment of some closed-form expressions for the Voigt function
    Schreier, Franz
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2016, 176 : 1 - 5
  • [10] Closed-form approximations for operational value-at-risk
    Hernandez, Lorenzo
    Tejero, Jorge
    Suarez, Alberto
    Carrillo-Menendez, Santiago
    JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RISK, 2013, 8 (04): : 39 - 54