Analysis of relationships between ecosystem services: A generic classification and review of the literature

被引:67
|
作者
Ndong, Gregory Obiang [1 ]
Therond, Olivier [2 ]
Cousin, Isabelle [1 ]
机构
[1] INRAE, URSOLS, F-45075 Orleans, France
[2] Univ Lorraine, INRAE, LAE, F-68000 Colmar, France
关键词
Ecosystem services; Trade-off; Synergy; Methodological classification; TRADE-OFFS; SPATIAL COVARIANCE; TEMPORAL VARIATION; LOESS PLATEAU; SYNERGIES; BIODIVERSITY; BUNDLES; QUANTIFICATION; GRADIENT; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101120
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The scientific literature contains many studies of trade-offs or synergies between ecosystem services (ES); however, it is challenging to qualify and compare these studies. To address this issue, we developed a structured generic methodological classification (typology) of studies that focuses on relationships between ES. The method focuses on characteristics of the spatial and temporal analyses performed and whether drivers of relationships between ES were considered. We used the typology to characterize 103 peer-reviewed articles from 1998 to 2017 identified from a search of the ISI Web of Science. Our results show that most of the studies (74%) focused on quantifying and analyzing ES relationships using a snapshot approach. Spatio-temporal analysis of ES relationships (6% of the studies) remains a major scientific challenge in research. While most studies analyzed drivers of relationships, they focused mainly on coarse indicators of land use and cover (change) and climate change (e.g. temperature and precipitation), and 70% of the studies analyzed relationships between 3 and 6 ES. This review highlights two key research issues: (i) going beyond analysis of coarse drivers by using indicators of land use and (ii) developing spatio-temporal analysis of ES relationships based on field methods to follow-up ES indicators over time or simulation models.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services
    Lee, Heera
    Lautenbach, Sven
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 66 : 340 - 351
  • [2] A Systematic Review of Relationships Between Mountain Wildfire and Ecosystem Services
    Jelena Vukomanovic
    Toddi Steelman
    Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 1179 - 1194
  • [3] A Systematic Review of Relationships Between Mountain Wildfire and Ecosystem Services
    Vukomanovic, Jelena
    Steelman, Toddi
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2019, 34 (05) : 1179 - 1194
  • [4] Ecosystem Services for Planning: A Generic Recommendation or a Real Framework? Insights from a Literature Review
    Ronchi, Silvia
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [5] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES - CLASSIFICATION AND DIFFERENT APPROACHES AT VARIOUS LEVELS OF BIOSPHERE ORGANISATION - A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Roo-Zielinska, Ewa
    Grabinska, Bozenna
    GEOGRAPHIA POLONICA, 2012, 85 (02) : 65 - 81
  • [6] Cultural Heritage and Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review
    Holleland, Herdis
    Skrede, Joar
    Holmgaard, Sanne Bech
    CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES, 2017, 19 (03) : 210 - 237
  • [7] Governance of ecosystem services: a review of empirical literature
    Winkler, Klara Johanna
    Garcia Rodrigues, Joao
    Albrecht, Eerika
    Crockett, Erin T. H.
    ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2021, 17 (01) : 306 - 319
  • [8] Exploring the Connections between Agroecological Practices and Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review
    Palomo-Campesino, Sara
    Gonzalez, Jose A.
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [9] Relationships between soil ecosystem services in temperate annual field crops: A systematic review
    Cadel, Maelys
    Cousin, Isabelle
    Therond, Olivier
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 902
  • [10] The influence of temporal variation on relationships between ecosystem services
    Robert A. Holland
    Felix Eigenbrod
    Paul R. Armsworth
    Barbara J. Anderson
    Chris D. Thomas
    Kevin J. Gaston
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2011, 20 : 3285 - 3294