Development and maintenance of surface gloss of dental composites after polishing and brushing: Review of the literature

被引:37
|
作者
Amaya-Pajares, Silvia P. [1 ]
Koi, Kiyono [1 ]
Watanabe, Hidehiko [1 ]
da Costa, Juliana B. [1 ]
Ferracane, Jack L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Sch Dent, 2370 SW Moody Ave, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
filler size; finishing; polishing; resin composite; toothbrush abrasion; RESIN-BASED COMPOSITES; ROUGHNESS; WEAR; COLOR; MICROHYBRID; NANOHYBRID; TEXTURE; SYSTEMS; TIME; INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.1111/jerd.12875
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective To describe the effect of the composites' composition to produce high surface smoothness/gloss using finishers/polishers, and to assess maintained smoothness/gloss under toothbrush abrasion. Materials and methods PubMed papers published from January 01, 2000 to September 01, 2021 were included, and keywords used were: filler particle size, shape, amount of dental composites; finishing/polishing, gloss/roughness, and toothbrush abrasion of composites. Seventy-five in-vitro studies were included in this literature review. Forty-six articles assessed filler particle size/composition/shape and distribution to obtain high gloss/smoothness on different formulations; and the finishers/polishers effect on these materials. Twenty-nine papers assessed toothbrush abrasion of composites. Results Suprananofill/nanofill/microfills typically showed the smoothest and glossiest surfaces compared to nanohybrid, microhybrid and hybrid composites. Microfill (0.04-0.07 mu m, 71-88 GU); suprananofill (0.001-0.8 mu m, 52-92 GU), microhybrids (0.05-0.35 mu m, 35-95 GU) and nanohybrids (0.05-0.21 mu m, 66-97 GU). Composites with small, spherical particles tend to show smoother, glossier surfaces and more wear resistant compared to resin composites with larger or irregular particles. Several studies showed higher roughness and reduced gloss after toothbrush abrasion. Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, suprananofill/nanofill/microfill composites tended to show the smoothest/glossiest surfaces due to smaller particle size. Composites with small, spherical particles tended to show smoother/glossier surfaces. Overall, toothbrush abrasion showed higher surface roughness and reduced gloss. Clinical Significance Suprananofills/nanofills/microfills had good polishability and polish retention due to their smaller particle size. The effectiveness of a polishing system is material-dependent. In general, Enhance-PoGo, Sof-Lex discs, and Sof-Lex Spiral wheels showed similar level of smoothness.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 41
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of a new polishing system on changes in gloss and surface roughness of resin composites after polishing and brushing
    Sang, Eun Jung
    Song, Ji-Soo
    Chung, Shin Hye
    Jin, Bo-Hyoung
    Hyun, Hong-Keun
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2021, 40 (03) : 727 - 735
  • [2] Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing
    da Costa, Juliana
    Ferracane, Jack
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2007, 19 (05) : 274 - 275
  • [3] Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing
    Mi-Sook Choi
    Yong-Keun Lee
    Bum-Soon Lim
    Sang-Hoon Rhee
    Hyeong-Cheol Yang
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2005, 16 : 347 - 353
  • [4] Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing
    Choi, MS
    Lee, YK
    Lim, BS
    Rhee, SH
    Yang, HC
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 16 (04) : 347 - 353
  • [5] Gloss and surface roughness produced by polishing kits on resin composites
    Sadidzadeh, Ramtin
    Cakir, Deniz
    Ramp, Lance C.
    Burgess, John O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2010, 23 (04): : 208 - 212
  • [6] Surface Roughness and Gloss of Actual Composites as Polished With Different Polishing Systems
    Rodrigues-Junior, S. A.
    Chemin, P.
    Piaia, P. P.
    Ferracane, J. L.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 40 (04) : 418 - 429
  • [7] Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro
    Heintze, SD
    Forjanic, M
    Rousson, V
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2006, 22 (02) : 146 - 165
  • [8] The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites
    Wakefield, Charles W.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2007, 19 (04) : 225 - 226
  • [9] Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites
    Antonson, Sibel A.
    Yazici, A. Ruya
    Kilinc, Evren
    Antonson, Donald E.
    Hardigan, Patrick C.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2011, 39 : E9 - E17
  • [10] Evaluation of Surface Roughness, Hardness, and Gloss of Composites After Three Different Finishing and Polishing Techniques: An In Vitro Study
    Nithya, Kumar
    Sridevi, Krishnamoorthy
    Keerthi, Venkatesan
    Ravishankar, Periasamy
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (02)