Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep

被引:238
|
作者
Ruckstuhl, KE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Biol, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/anbe.1998.0745
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Like many sexually dimorphic ungulates, bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis, form sexually segregated groups. Nursery groups include females, lambs and subadult males, while adult males form bachelor groups. Previous hypotheses to account for sexual segregation in ungulates have suggested sexual differences in energy requirements, predation risk and social preferences. I tested the hypothesis that differing nutritional demands, due to sexual dimorphism in body size, would lead to different movement patterns and time budgets. If ruminating/foraging schedules differed according to body size, males and females could not synchronize their activities and therefore would segregate by sex. To test this hypothesis, I observed a population of marked bighorns. I recorded the time males and females spent lying, grazing or walking during 8-14 h of focal-animal observations. Initial and final location of groups and steps taken per minute foraging were also noted. Females spent more time foraging and walking and had longer foraging and walking bouts than adult males, but did not differ in numbers of steps taken while foraging. Males spent more time lying than females. Subadult males switched between nursery and bachelor groups and changed their foraging behaviour depending on the type of group they were in. The distance moved was on average almost four times greater for female than for male groups. I suggest that sexual difference in time budgets and movement patterns make it difficult for males and females to stay in the same,group and therefore lead to sexual segregation. (C) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 106
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sexual segregation in desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis Mexicana)
    Mooring, MS
    Fitzpatrick, TA
    Benjamin, JE
    Fraser, IC
    Nishihira, TT
    Reisig, DD
    Rominger, EM
    BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 140 : 183 - 207
  • [2] Sexual segregation and use of water by bighorn sheep: implications for conservation
    Whiting, J. C.
    Bowyer, R. T.
    Flinders, J. T.
    Bleich, V. C.
    Kie, J. G.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 13 (06) : 541 - 548
  • [3] The role of foraging behaviour in the sexual segregation of the African elephant
    Shannon, Graeme
    Page, Bruce R.
    Duffy, Kevin J.
    Slotow, Rob
    OECOLOGIA, 2006, 150 (02) : 344 - 354
  • [4] The role of foraging behaviour in the sexual segregation of the African elephant
    Graeme Shannon
    Bruce R. Page
    Kevin J. Duffy
    Rob Slotow
    Oecologia, 2006, 150 : 344 - 354
  • [5] Can the activity budget hypothesis explain sexual segregation in desert bighorn sheep?
    Neuhaus, P
    Ruckstuhl, KE
    BEHAVIOUR, 2004, 141 : 513 - 520
  • [6] Sexual Segregation in Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep, Ovis canadensis sierrae: Ramifications for Conservation
    Schroeder, Cody A.
    Bowyer, R. Terry
    Bleich, Vernon C.
    Stephenson, Thomas R.
    ARCTIC ANTARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH, 2010, 42 (04) : 476 - 489
  • [7] Sexual segregation in moose Alces alces:: an experimental manipulation of foraging behaviour
    Spaeth, DF
    Bowyer, RT
    Stephenson, TR
    Barboza, PS
    WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2004, 10 (01) : 59 - 72
  • [8] EFFECTS OF SNOW ON FORAGING ECOLOGY AND NUTRITION OF BIGHORN SHEEP
    GOODSON, NJ
    STEVENS, DR
    BAILEY, JA
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1991, 55 (02): : 214 - 222
  • [9] Sympatric cattle grazing and desert bighorn sheep foraging
    Garrison, Kyle R.
    Cain, James W., III
    Rominger, Eric M.
    Goldstein, Elise J.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 80 (02): : 197 - 207
  • [10] Sexual segregation in foraging giraffe
    Mramba, Rosemary Peter
    Mahenya, Obeid
    Siyaya, Annetjie
    Mathisen, Karen Marie
    Andreassen, Harry Peter
    Skarpe, Christina
    ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2017, 79 : 26 - 35