Do Relative Advantages in STEM Grades Explain the Gender Gap in Selection of a STEM Major in College? A Multimethod Answer

被引:24
|
作者
Stearns, Elizabeth [1 ]
Bottia, Martha Cecilia [2 ]
Giersch, Jason [3 ]
Mickelson, Roslyn Arlin [4 ]
Moller, Stephanie [1 ]
Jha, Nandan [5 ]
Dancy, Melissa [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Sociol & Publ Policy, 9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Dept Sociol, Charlotte, NC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Charlotte, NC USA
[4] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Sociol Publ Policy & Women & Gender Studies, Charlotte, NC USA
[5] Valdosta State Univ, Publ Policy & Publ Adm, Dept Polit Sci, Valdosta, GA USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Dept Phys, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
gender studies; higher education; science education; mixed methods; RACIAL COMPOSITION; FEMALE ADVANTAGE; HIGHER-EDUCATION; SEX SEGREGATION; CAREER CHOICE; SCHOOL; SCIENCE; WOMEN; MATHEMATICS; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.3102/0002831219853533
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Using a multimethod approach, we investigate whether gender gaps in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) major declaration in college are explained by differences in the grades that students earn in STEM versus non-STEM subjects. With quantitative data, we find that relative advantages in college academic performance in STEM versus non-STEM subjects do not contribute to the gender gap in STEM major declaration. To explore alternative explanations for gender gaps in major declaration, we analyze interviews with college seniors, finding that they recognize many other factors, including their interests in subject matter and confidence, are key in pushing them from STEM or pulling them into non-STEM majors. We conclude that future research seeking to account for gender gaps in STEM majors must extend beyond academic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 257
页数:40
相关论文
共 24 条