Do Institutional Investors Aggravate or Attenuate Stock Return Volatility? Evidence from Thailand

被引:1
|
作者
Thanatawee, Yordying [1 ]
机构
[1] Burapha Univ, Grad Sch Commerce, Finance, 169 Longhard Bangsaen Rd, Chon Buri 20131, Thailand
来源
关键词
Volatility; Stock Return; Institutional Investor; Institutional Ownership; Thailand; FOREIGN OWNERSHIP; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; SPECIFICATION; INDIVIDUALS; BEHAVIOR; VOLUME; IMPACT; TESTS;
D O I
10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no3.0195
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether institutional investors increase or decrease the volatility of stock returns in the Thai stock market. For the purpose we used the data from SETSMART, a database provided by the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). Our sample is a balanced panel data covering 3,160 firm-year observations from 316 nonfinancial firms listed on the SET from 2011 to 2020. We analyze the link between institutional holdings and the volatility of stock returns by the pooled Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model, the fixed effects model, and the random-effects model. In particular, we regress the stock return volatility on institutional ownership while controlling for firm size, financial leverage, growth opportunities, and stock turnover and accounting for industry effects and year effects. Our results indicate institutional investors' positive and significant influence on the volatility of the stock returns. Additionally, we performed the dynamic Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) estimator to alleviate concerns of possible endogeneity. The result still shows a positive impact of institutional investors on the volatility in stock returns. Overall, the findings of this study suggest that an increase in the volatility of stock returns in the Thai stock market may stem from a higher proportion of equity held by the institutional investors.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility
    Bushee, BJ
    Noe, CF
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2000, 38 : 171 - 202
  • [2] A Study on How Institutional Investors Respond to Risk, Return and Volatility: Evidence from the Indian Stock Market
    Dey, Manisha
    Mishra, Sasmita
    De, Suddhasanta
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (01) : 5072 - 5093
  • [3] Institutional investors and stock market volatility. Evidence from Korea
    ikizlerli, Deniz
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (06) : 473 - 476
  • [4] Discussion of corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility
    Venkatachalam, M
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2000, 38 : 203 - 207
  • [5] Institutional investors and stock returns volatility: Empirical evidence from a natural experiment
    Bohl, Martin T.
    Brzeszczynski, Janusz
    Wilfling, Bernd
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2009, 5 (02) : 170 - 182
  • [6] Institutional investors and stock market volatility
    Gabaix, Xavier
    Gopikrishnan, Parameswaran
    Plerou, Vasiliki
    Stanley, H. Eugene
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 121 (02): : 461 - 504
  • [7] Institutional Investors' Shareholding Ratio and Stock Return Volatility Empirical Findings from the a Share Market
    Yu, Qian
    Li, Tao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (FEBM 2018), 2018, 56 : 148 - 151
  • [8] Stabilizing or destabilizing: the effect of institutional investors on stock return volatility in an emerging market
    Batra, Shallu
    Yadav, Mahender
    Jindal, Ishu
    Saini, Mohit
    Kumar, Pankaj
    MULTINATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 32 (02) : 204 - 225
  • [9] The Relationship Between Stock Return Volatility and Trading Volume: Evidence from the Investors in the Taiwan Stock Market
    Kuo, Shewhuei
    Hsiao, Junglieh
    Chan Huiju
    ENVIRONMENT, LOW-CARBON AND STRATEGY, 2011, : 956 - 959
  • [10] Foreign institutional investors and market return volatility: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric models
    Usmani, Faisal
    Ghayas, Atif
    Shamshad, Mohd
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICS AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2022, 25 (05) : 1175 - 1184