Assessment criteria in identifying the sick sepsis patient

被引:7
|
作者
Jones, GR
机构
[1] Southampton Univ Hosp Trust, Dept Microbiol, Southampton SO16 6YD, Hants, England
[2] Southampton Univ Hosp Trust, Publ Hlth Lab, Southampton SO16 6YD, Hants, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0163-4453(98)92710-4
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Standard definitions of sepsis have been proposed and have been widely adopted. Recognition of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and assessment of its severity can easily be achieved at the bedside using basic observations and simple laboratory tests. Fulfilment of standardized criteria defining increasing severity of sepsis or manifestation of two, three and four SIRS criteria directly correlates with risk of mortality and progression to organ failure. However, manifestation of only two SIRS criteria identifies patients who may have relatively mild disease. Furthermore, sepsis definitions take no account of pre-existing illness, source of infection or causative agent, all of which have a significant influence on outcome. Despite these limitations, manifestation of four SIRS criteria or the persistence of markers of severe sepsis identifies individuals on general wards who are at particularly high risk of death, who should be closely monitored for deterioration and discussed with an intensive-care physician at an early stage. If the source of sepsis is not clear, empirical antibiotic therapy for such individuals should be discussed with a medical microbiologist or infectious diseases physician.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 29
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of the patient with neutropenic sepsis
    Welsh, Sarah J.
    Strauss, Sandra J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2012, 73 (06) : C89 - C92
  • [2] Predictors for Identifying Burn Sepsis and Performance vs Existing Criteria
    Hill, David M.
    Percy, Matthew D.
    Velamuri, Sai R.
    Lanfranco, Julio
    Legro, Ivan Romero
    Sinclair, Scott E.
    Hickerson, William L.
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2018, 39 (06): : 982 - 988
  • [3] IDENTIFYING SEPSIS IN TRIAGE: ASSESSMENT OF A NURSE TRIAGE TOOL
    Cleophax, C.
    Bernard, S.
    Pasquereau, V.
    Celine, M.
    Poiree, L.
    Simon, N.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 : 218 - 218
  • [4] Sepsis Surveillance Using Adult Sepsis Events Simplified eSOFA Criteria Versus Sepsis-3 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Criteria*
    Rhee, Chanu
    Zhang, Zilu
    Kadri, Sameer S.
    Murphy, David J.
    Martin, Greg S.
    Overton, Elizabeth
    Seymour, Christopher W.
    Angus, Derek C.
    Dantes, Raymund
    Epstein, Lauren
    Fram, David
    Schaaf, Richard
    Wang, Rui
    Klompas, Michael
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (03) : 307 - 314
  • [5] Identifying crucial sustainability assessment criteria for container seaports
    Lu, Chin-Shan
    Shang, Kuo-Chung
    Lin, Chi-Chang
    MARITIME BUSINESS REVIEW, 2016, 1 (02) : 90 - 106
  • [6] Preoperative assessment and criteria for patient selection
    Lang-Lazdunski, L.
    LUNG CANCER, 2006, 54 : S31 - S31
  • [7] Educational needs assessment identifying opportunities to improve sepsis care
    Davino, Tammy
    Van Hoof, Thomas J.
    Elwell, Joy
    DeLayo, Michelle
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (04)
  • [8] CONSIDERATION OF OCCULT INFECTION AND SEPSIS MIMICS IN THE SICK PATIENT WITHOUT AN APPARENT INFECTIOUS SOURCE
    Boushra, Marina N.
    Miller, Susan N.
    Koyfman, Alex
    Long, Brit
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 56 (01): : 36 - 45
  • [9] HOW SICK A PATIENT - REPORT OF A WORKSHOP ON CANCER RISK ASSESSMENT
    GORI, GB
    FLAMM, WG
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 14 (03) : 215 - 222
  • [10] THE ROLE OF PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA IN IDENTIFYING OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS
    Meyers, J.
    Mitra, D.
    Doan, J.
    Leeflang, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A281 - A281