Projection vs. relaxation of adjacent bulk deformation for surface modeling: Theoretical and numerical aspects

被引:2
|
作者
Sievers, Christian [1 ]
Mosler, Joern [1 ]
Kurzeja, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] TU Dortmund, Insitute Mech, Leonhard Euler Str 5, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany
关键词
Surface modeling; Projection; relaxation; Finite element implementation; Variational principles; GENERAL CONSERVATION EQUATIONS; ENERGY; ELASTICITY; CRYSTALS; INSIGHTS; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111084
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Motivated by a strong coupling between bulk and surface physics, we present two approaches to derive continuum surface models from the three-dimensional, adjacent bulk deformation: projection and relaxation. In contrast to conventional ad hoc models, properties like the surface stress are consistently derived from a hyperelastic thermodynamic potential. While the projection approach captures classical in-plane stresses, the relaxation approach can further relax normal-normal and normal-shear coupling. A projection onto the surface is indeed always a relaxation if anisotropy is superficial, but not vice versa. The distinct behavior of projection and relaxation is theoretically discussed and highlighted by specific examples. Numerical implementation in a finite-element framework is subsequently elaborated. Its performance is illustrated by isotropic and anisotropic surface energies of a free cube and a beam under tension. Finally, both projection and relaxation constitute valuable alternatives to conventional surface models in terms of physics, geometry and computation. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surface deformation vs. bulk plastic deformation - a key for microscopic control of surfaces in metal forming
    Ike, H
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 138 (1-3) : 250 - 255
  • [2] Modeling of surface vs. bulk ionic conductivity in fixed charge membranes
    Mafé, S
    Manzanares, JA
    Ramirez, P
    PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 5 (02) : 376 - 383
  • [3] Deformation mechanisms of zinc:: Coating vs. bulk material
    Parisot, R
    Forest, S
    Pineau, A
    Mareuse, D
    Démonet, X
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR, PLASTICITY AND DAMAGE, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 407 - 412
  • [4] Luminescence in porous silicon - surface vs. bulk
    Narasimhan, K.L.
    Banerjee, S.
    Journal of Porous Materials, 2000, 7 (01) : 283 - 286
  • [5] Luminescence in Porous Silicon—Surface vs. Bulk
    K.L. Narasimhan
    S. Banerjee
    Journal of Porous Materials, 2000, 7 : 283 - 286
  • [6] Presupposition Projection From 'and' vs. 'or': Experimental Data and Theoretical Implications
    Kalomoiros, Alexandros
    Schwarz, Florian
    JOURNAL OF SEMANTICS, 2024, 41 (3-4) : 331 - 372
  • [7] Numerical Modeling of Cyclic Deformation in Bulk Metallic Glasses
    Jiang, Yunpeng
    METALS, 2016, 6 (09):
  • [8] Luminescence in porous silicon-surface vs. bulk
    Narasimhan, KL
    Banerjee, S
    JOURNAL OF POROUS MATERIALS, 2000, 7 (1-3) : 283 - 286
  • [9] Superconductivity in Weyl Semimetal NbP: Bulk vs. Surface
    Baenitz, M.
    Schmidt, M.
    Suess, V.
    Felser, C.
    Lueders, K.
    31ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUPERCONDUCTIVITY (ISS2018), 2019, 1293
  • [10] Experimental tests vs. theoretical modeling for FRC in compression
    Bencardino, F.
    Rizzuti, L.
    Spadea, G.
    FRACTURE MECHANICS OF CONCRETE AND CONCRETE STRUCTURES, VOLS 1-3: VOL 1: NEW TRENDS IN FRACTURE MECHANICS OF CONCRETE; VOL 2: DESIGN, ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF RC STRUCTURES; VOL 3: HIGH-PERFORMANCE CONCRETE, BRICK-MASONRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS, 2007, 1-3 : 1473 - 1480