New Standards of Accreditation in Health Service Psychology: Rationale, Opportunities, and Challenges

被引:9
|
作者
Bell, Debora J. [1 ]
Bieschke, Kathleen J. [2 ]
Zlotlow, Susan [3 ]
Paternite, Carl E. [4 ]
Illfelder-Kaye, Joyce [5 ]
McCutcheon, Stephen [6 ]
Knauss, Linda [7 ]
Klonoff, Elizabeth [8 ,9 ]
Wall, Jacqueline [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Clin Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Educ Psychol Counseling & Special Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] QuantAid LLC, Glenelg, MD USA
[4] Miami Univ, Psychol, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Ctr Counseling & Psychol Serv, Training, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[6] VA Puget Sound, Psychol Training, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Widener Univ, Inst Grad Clin Psychol, Chester, PA 19013 USA
[8] Univ Cent Florida, Res, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[9] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Grad Studies, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[10] Amer Psychol Assoc, Off Program Consultat & Accreditat, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[11] Amer Psychol Assoc, Educ Directorate, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
accreditation; educational process; training and education; professional psychology; PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY; COMPETENCE; RECOMMENDATIONS; REFLECTIONS; EDUCATION; CULTURE; STEPS;
D O I
10.1037/tep0000163
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The intent of this article is to inform the training community about the contextual and conceptual framework that guided development of the Standards of Accreditation (SoA) and to summarize the major changes in accreditation introduced by the SoA. First, the authors address the need for new accreditation standards in light of the evolving landscapes of psychology, higher education, and health care. They then describe the process by which the Commission on Accreditation (CoA) and its communities of interest worked together to develop the SoA and present the general guiding principles and the specific rationale for the most significant changes. Changes in six areas are described in depth, including labeling the profession, level-specific standards, addressing diversity, the discipline-specific knowledge base, defining appropriate competencies, and contingent accreditation. The authors conclude with a discussion of what they envision as the promise of the SoA, including thoughts about the responsibility of the profession (including the CoA and the training and professional communities) to promote and ensure quality training in health service psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 218
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条