Marking and providing feedback face-to-face: Staff and student perspectives

被引:26
作者
Chalmers, Charlotte [1 ]
Mowat, Elaine [2 ,4 ]
Chapman, Maggie [3 ]
机构
[1] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Life Sport & Social Sci, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] AMINA, 1-3,6 Whitehall Crescent, Dundee DD1 4AU, Scotland
[4] The Welcoming, 20-1 Westfield Ave, Edinburgh EH11 2TT, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
face-to-face marking; feedback dialogue; marking linked to feedback; PEER-ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTIONS; COURSEWORK; QUALITY; WRITTEN; TUTORS;
D O I
10.1177/1469787417721363
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The setting, marking and providing feedback on assessments form an important part of a tutor's role. Studies into the use of feedback and how it is interpreted by students indicate a mismatch between what students are looking for and what tutors think they are giving. Tutors comment that students are more interested in the mark than the feedback, and yet students indicate that they do not get enough feedback or that it is not useful. This study investigates student and staff perceptions of the linking of marking and feedback in face-to-face sessions. A cohort of year 1 university students were given the option of receiving either written feedback or a 15-minute meeting with one of their tutors to have their essay marked with them. In all, 49 students chose face-to-face marking, and the remaining 35 students received written feedback. Focus groups were used to investigate the student experience. Staff members were also asked to reflect on the process. Students and staff found the experience of face-to-face marking beneficial and positive. Both felt that the time spent together allowed for a feedback dialogue about the piece of work and that staff could explain and justify why marks were given.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 45
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers' reflections on their practices [J].
Bailey, Richard ;
Garner, Mark .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 15 (02) :187-198
[2]  
Barbour R., 2018, DOING FOCUS GROUPS
[3]   Feedback-dialogues: exploring the student perspective [J].
Blair, Alasdair ;
McGinty, Samantha .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (04) :466-476
[4]   Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources [J].
Bloxham, Sue .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 34 (02) :209-220
[5]  
Boud D., 2013, Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074336, DOI 10.4324/9780203074336]
[6]   The Validity of Examination Essays in Higher Education: Issues and Responses [J].
Brown, Gavin .
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2010, 64 (03) :276-291
[7]  
Bryman A., 2016, Social Research Methods
[8]   Differing perceptions in the feedback process [J].
Carless, D .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 31 (02) :219-233
[9]   Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment [J].
Chemers, MM ;
Hu, LT ;
Garcia, BF .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 93 (01) :55-64
[10]  
Chickering W.A., 1987, 7 PRINCIPLES GOOD PR