A Double-Blind, Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Sertindole and Risperidone in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

被引:27
|
作者
Kane, John M. [1 ,2 ]
Potkin, Steven G. [3 ]
Daniel, David G. [4 ,5 ]
Buckley, Peter F. [6 ]
机构
[1] Zucker Hillside Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Glen Oaks, NY 11004 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[4] George Washington Univ, Dept Psychiat, Washington, DC USA
[5] Bioniche Dev Inc, Falls Church, VA USA
[6] Med Coll Georgia, Dept Psychiat, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ATYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTIC-DRUGS; REFRACTORY SCHIZOPHRENIA; NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS; WEIGHT-GAIN; CLOZAPINE; OLANZAPINE; HALOPERIDOL; METAANALYSIS; QUETIAPINE; TOLERABILITY;
D O I
10.4088/JCP.07m03733yel
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: The comparative efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics has yet to be fully elucidated in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of sertindole, compared to risperidone, in this patient population. Method: In this multicenter, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, only patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia who had failed an adequate antipsychotic treatment within the previous 6 months and who had not responded positively to haloperidol during screening were eligible for enrollment. The primary efficacy variable was change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) from baseline to final assessment. Weekly assessments included the PANSS, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. The study was conducted between June 1996 and April 1998. Results: Of the 321 patients randomly assigned to double-blind treatment, 217 patients completed the study (sertindole, n/n = 142/216 [66%]; risperidone, n/n = 75/105 [71%]). The main reason for withdrawal in both groups was ineffective therapy. The between-group difference in PANSS total score was not statistically significant and both groups showed improvement, with mean changes of - 18.6 in the sertindole group and -20.9 in the risperidone group based on observed cases and -12.0 and -19.0, respectively, based on the last-observation-carried-forward method for imputing missing data. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in any of the secondary end points: PANSS positive and negative subscales, CGI scores, BPRS total scores and positive symptom sub-scale scores, and SANS total scores. Patients reported similar levels of adverse events and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), except for extrapyramidal syndrome-related TEAEs, which were more common in the risperidone-treated group. Prolongation of the QTc interval was observed significantly more frequently with sertindole treatment. Conclusions: Sertindole and risperidone are effective and well-tolerated in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Sertindole offers an alternative treatment option for refractory patients in Europe given its good EPS profile, favorable metabolic profile, and comparable efficacy to risperidone. J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72(2):194-204 (C) Copyright 2010 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 204
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risperidone versus clozapine in treatment-resistant chronic schizophrenia: A randomized double-blind study
    Bondolfi, G
    Dufour, H
    Patris, M
    May, JP
    Billeter, U
    Eap, CB
    Baumann, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 155 (04): : 499 - 504
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of sertindole, and risperidone in treatment resistant patients with schizophrenia
    Kane, JM
    Potkin, S
    Buckley, P
    Daniel, DG
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2005, 31 (02) : 490 - 490
  • [3] A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, RISPERIDONE-COMPARATIVE STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BLONANSERIN IN PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA
    Kim, Seunghyun
    Yang, Jaewon
    Jeon, Yangwhan
    Bahk, Wonmyong
    Kim, Yongku
    Kim, Heecheol
    Kwon, Junsoo
    Jung, Heeyeon
    Kim, Chanhyung
    Lee, Sangyeol
    Kim, Younghoon
    Yi, Jungseo
    Jon, Dukin
    Cho, Hyunsang
    Lee, Seunghwan
    Yoon, Bohyun
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2010, 117 (2-3) : 378 - 379
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety of Yokukansan in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Miyaoka, Tsuyoshi
    Furuya, Motohide
    Horiguchi, Jun
    Wake, Rei
    Hashioka, Sadayuki
    Thoyama, Masaya
    Murotani, Kenta
    Mori, Norio
    Minabe, Yoshio
    Iyo, Masaomi
    Ueno, Shuichi
    Ezoe, Sachiko
    Hoshino, Syuzo
    Seno, Haruo
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 2015
  • [5] A randomized, double-blind study of quetiapine and risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia
    Zhong, K
    Harvey, P
    Brecher, M
    Sweitzer, D
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 29 : S232 - S232
  • [6] A randomized double-blind study of quetiapine and risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia
    Zhong, K
    Harvey, P
    Brecher, M
    Sweitzer, D
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2005, 31 (02) : 508 - 508
  • [7] A double-blind comparison of clozapine and risperidone on spatial working memory in treatment-resistant schizophrenia
    McGurk, SR
    Goldman, RS
    Carter, C
    Green, MF
    Schooler, NR
    Marder, SR
    Kane, JM
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2001, 49 (1-2) : 238 - 238
  • [8] A double-blind, controlled study of sertindole versus risperidone in the treatment of moderate-to-severe schizophrenia
    Azorin, JM
    Strub, N
    Loft, H
    INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 21 (01) : 49 - 56
  • [9] Safety and efficacy of clozapine/risperidone combination in the treatment-resistant schizophrenia
    Kujundziska, MJ
    Lazarova, V
    Filovska, V
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 15 : S502 - S502
  • [10] Levomepromazine versus chlorpromazine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a double-blind randomized trial
    Lal, S
    Thavundayil, JX
    Nair, NPV
    Annable, L
    Kin, NY
    Gabriel, A
    Schwartz, G
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 31 (04): : 271 - 279