Interfacial fracture toughness between resin-modified glass ionomer and dentin using three different surface treatments

被引:11
|
作者
Setien, VJ
Armstrong, SR
Wefel, JS
机构
[1] Univ Andes, Fac Odontol, Dept Restorat Dent, Merida 5101, Venezuela
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Dent, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
glass ionomer; fracture toughness; dentine; adhesion;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. To identify the tong-term dentin-resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) interfacial fracture toughness (FT) using three different dentin surface treatments prior to RMGIC placement. Fuji II LC (GC America) was bonded to dentin using cavity conditioner (CC), Scotchbond Multipurpose (3M ESPE) complete system (SS), or Scotchbond etching and priming without adhesive (SP). Twenty-four teeth were used for each of the three groups. Methods. Two samples were obtained from each tooth and they were stored in artificial saliva (AS) or oil for 1- or 24-weeks before determining interfacial FT. The results were fit to Weibull distributions with log-rank and Wilcoxon tests for comparison of failure curves over time for each experimental condition. Statistical analysis was performed at a 0.05 level of significance. Results. FT values in artificial saliva were as follows: 1 week SS = SP > CC, 6 months SS > SP=CC; in oil SS=SP=CC for both storage times. A significant decline in FT occurred between 1- and 24-week storage for SS and SP. Storage in oil, on the other hand tended to increase FT values for all groups. Significance. These observations support findings of hydrolytic degradation in adhesive resin-based surface treatments. (c) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Academy of Dental Materials. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 504
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating Dentin Surface Treatments for Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials
    Imbery, T. A.
    Namboodiri, A.
    Duncan, A.
    Amos, R.
    Best, A. M.
    Moon, P. C.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 38 (04) : 429 - 438
  • [2] Effect of different surface treatments on the shear and microtensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to dentin
    Altunsoy, Mustafa
    Botsali, Murat Selim
    Korkut, Emre
    Kucukyilmaz, Ebru
    Sener, Yagmur
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 72 (08) : 874 - 879
  • [3] Occlusal wear of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement following three surface treatments
    Wu C.H.
    Smales R.J.
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2001, 5 (1) : 26 - 30
  • [4] Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements
    Mitchell, CA
    Douglas, WH
    Cheng, YS
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 1999, 15 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [5] Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Bonding to enamel and dentin
    Fritz, UB
    Finger, WJ
    Uno, S
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 1996, 12 (03) : 161 - 166
  • [6] Effect of storage conditions on fracture toughness of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Setien, VJ
    Armstrong, SR
    Boyer, DB
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A422 - A422
  • [7] Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements
    School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University of Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BP, United Kingdom
    不详
    Dent. Mater., 1 (7-13):
  • [8] FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS OF RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMERS
    KOVARIK, RE
    MUNCY, MV
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1995, 8 (03): : 145 - 148
  • [9] Pretreatment effects on bonding resin-modified glass-ionomer to dentin
    Erickson, RL
    Glasspoole, EA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 788 - 788
  • [10] SEM evaluation of dentin/resin-modified glass ionomer interfaces.
    Ing, S
    Tam, LE
    Burgess, KL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 : 2436 - 2436