AHP-Assisted Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Planning of Microgrids

被引:0
|
作者
Bohra, Shabbir S. [1 ]
Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad [2 ]
Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam [3 ]
机构
[1] Sarvajanik Coll Engn & Technol, Elect Engn Dept, Surat, India
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Energy Technol, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Univ Tabriz, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); analytic hierarchy process (AHP); energy sources; microgrid;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The planning stage of any project, could it be for an industry, a commercial or energy supply system, has crucial significance and involves judicious contribution from field experts to decision makers (DM). The objective of this paper is presenting a model for planning of energy sources for microgrid using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) based on analytic hierarchic process ( AHP) approach. For developing a model, an educational institution's electrical energy load demand has been considered as reference. In this assessment, the main-utility grid as the primary source of electricity, alongside conventional sources like diesel generator (DG), gas-based combined heat-and-power (CHP) with absorption chiller to meet cooling demand of facility is taken into account. Moreover, proven and comparatively most environmentally friendly renewable energy sources, such as solar photovoltaic (PV) together with battery energy storage system (BESS) have been taken into account. Moreover, the assessment and evaluation for prioritization of energy sources based on critical criteria or attributes and their associated sub-criteria have been judged to make decision. In this model, most of the critically influencing criteria, such as economic, technical, structural, operational and maintenance, environmental and societal aspects are being focused on. In total, nine alternatives-combinations of grid and other energy source(s)-are identified to form the microgrid. The weight score for each combination of sources is computed for each of the 22 criteria and could be presented DMs to enlist priority of alternatives to choose from.
引用
收藏
页码:4557 / 4562
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria Decision-making in Urban Planning
    Kilnarova, Pavla
    6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 2017, : 94 - 100
  • [2] A multi-criteria decision-making model to increase productivity: AHP and fuzzy AHP approach
    Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
    不详
    Int. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Appl., 2013, 3-4 (207-229):
  • [3] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM) TECHNIQUES IN PLANNING
    MASSAM, BH
    PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1988, 30 : 1 - &
  • [4] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis E.
    Delolme L.
    Antomarchi A.-L.
    Durieux S.
    Duc E.
    Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20
  • [5] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [6] A fuzzy AHP based multi-criteria decision-making model to select a cloud service
    Seo, K.K. (kwangkyu@smu.ac.kr), 1600, Science and Engineering Research Support Society (08):
  • [7] Multi-criteria renewable energy planning decision-making model based on VIKOR
    Dai Chun-yan
    Zhang Xi-liang
    Wang En-chuang
    Liu Zhen
    Tang Song-lin
    RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY II, PTS 1-4, 2012, 512-515 : 1174 - +
  • [8] A Model for Linguistic Dynamic Multi-criteria Decision-Making
    Jiang, Le
    Liu, Hongbin
    Martinez, Luis
    Cai, Jianfeng
    FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ISKE 2013), 2014, 277 : 939 - 949
  • [9] A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Selecting a Maturity Model
    dos Santos-Neto, Joao Batista Sarmento
    Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [10] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168