Comparison of the dose response to levalbuterol with and without pretreatment with S-albuterol after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

被引:2
|
作者
Raissy, Hengameh H. [1 ]
Harkins, Michelle [1 ]
Esparham, Anna [1 ]
Kelly, H. William [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Sch Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
来源
PHARMACOTHERAPY | 2007年 / 27卷 / 09期
关键词
asthma; levalbuterol; S-albuterol; R-albuterol; methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction;
D O I
10.1592/phco.27.9.1231
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Study Objective. To determine the effect of S-albuterol on the dose response to levalbuterol in patients with moderate bronchoconstriction induced by a methacholine challenge. Design. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Setting. University-affiliated clinical trial center. Patients. Twenty-two adults with mild, stable asthma. Intervention. At the screening visit, patients were switched from their beta(2)-agonist to ipratropium bromide for use as an as-needed rescue therapy At the baseline visit 2-6 days later, the provocative concentration of methacholine to induce a 30% decrease in forced expiratory volume in I second (FEV1 PC30) was determined, followed by a nebulized racemic albuterol dose-response study with three doses of albuterol, to familiarize patients with the procedures. At visits 2 and 3, patients were randomly assigned to receive nebulized normal saline placebo or S-albuterol 5 mg before the methacholine challenge and were administered three escalating doses of levalbuterol after the challenge. Measurements and Main Results. Area under the curve for FEV1 over 40 minutes (AUC(0-40)) after administration of levalbuterol was the primary outcome, with slope of FEV1 as the secondary outcome. In addition, the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) was measured before and after the challenges. In the 17 patients who met criteria for completion, no deleterious effect for S-albuterol was found for FEV1 PC30, AUC(0-40) FEV1, or the FEV, Slope(0-40). However, S-albuterol reduced the provocative concentration of methacholine to induce a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20 0.52 +/- 2.06 vs 0.39 +/- 1.58 mg/ml, placebo vs S-albuterol, p=0.044) but did not affect FeNO. Conclusion. A single high dose of S-albuterol did not alter the bronchodilator response to levalbuterol. The effect on bronchial responsiveness requires further study.
引用
收藏
页码:1231 / 1236
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Comparison of relaxant effects of propofol on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in dogs with and without vagotomy
    Kabara, S
    Hirota, K
    Hashiba, E
    Yoshioka, H
    Kudo, T
    Sato, T
    Matsuki, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 86 (02) : 249 - 253
  • [2] Propofol antagonizes methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in dogs with and without wagotomy
    Kabara, S
    Hirota, K
    Hashiba, E
    Yoshioka, H
    Matsuki, A
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (3A) : U232 - U232
  • [3] Assessment of Bronchodilator Responsiveness after Methacholine-Induced Bronchoconstriction
    Suh, Dong In
    Koh, Young Yull
    ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 3 (04) : 215 - 216
  • [4] SYMPATHETIC RESPONSE DURING METHACHOLINE-INDUCED BRONCHOCONSTRICTION AND ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION
    SANDS, M
    DOUGLAS, F
    GILDEN, J
    ROBERTSON, G
    GREEN, J
    BANNER, A
    LEFF, A
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 32 (02): : A247 - A247
  • [5] Comparison of formoterol, salbutamol and salmeterol in methacholine-induced severe bronchoconstriction
    Politiek, MJ
    Boorsma, M
    Aalbers, R
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1999, 13 (05) : 988 - 992
  • [6] COMPARISON OF MAGNITUDE OF RESPONSE IN TESTS OF AIR-FLOW OBSTRUCTION IN METHACHOLINE-INDUCED BRONCHOCONSTRICTION IN NORMALS
    GUANCI, JJ
    BRAMAN, SS
    IRWIN, RS
    MIECH, RP
    CORRAO, WM
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1976, 24 (05): : A642 - A642
  • [7] A comparison of the relaxant effects of olprinone and aminophylline on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in dogs
    Hirota, K
    Yoshioka, H
    Kabara, S
    Kudo, T
    Ishihara, H
    Matsuki, A
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (01): : 230 - 233
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF THE SPEEDS OF ACTION OF SALMETEROL AND SALBUTAMOL IN REVERSING METHACHOLINE-INDUCED BRONCHOCONSTRICTION
    BEACH, JR
    YOUNG, CL
    STENTON, SC
    AVERY, AJ
    WALTERS, EH
    HENDRICK, DJ
    PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 5 (02): : 133 - 135
  • [9] A comparison of the onset of action of salbutamol and formoterol in reversing methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction
    van Noord, JA
    Smeets, JJ
    Maesen, FPV
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1998, 92 (12) : 1346 - 1351
  • [10] Relief of dyspnoea by β2-agonists after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction
    van der Woude, HJ
    Postma, DS
    Politiek, MJ
    Winter, TH
    Aalbers, R
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 98 (09) : 816 - 820