Differential diagnosis of central lymphoma and high-grade glioma: dynamic contrast-enhanced histogram

被引:16
|
作者
Zhang, Han-wen [1 ]
Lyu, Gui-wen [1 ]
He, Wen-jie [1 ]
Lei, Yi [1 ]
Lin, Fan [1 ]
Feng, Yu-ning [1 ]
Wang, Meng-zhu [2 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol,Shenzhen Second Peoples Hosp, 3002 SunGangXi Rd, Shenzhen 518035, Peoples R China
[2] Siemens Healthineers, Dept MR Sci Mkt, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Dynamic contrast enhancement; high-grade glioma; central nervous system lymphoma; histogram; differential diagnosis; CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; GLIOBLASTOMA; DIFFUSION; CLASSIFICATION; GUIDELINES; UTILITY; MRI;
D O I
10.1177/0284185119896519
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background In clinical diagnosis, some central nervous system lymphomas (CNSL) are difficult to distinguish from high-grade gliomas (HGG). Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the histogram analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the identification of CNSL and HGG. Material and Methods In all, 43 patients diagnosed with HGG (n = 28) and CNSL (n = 15) by histopathology underwent DCE-MRI scanning. Differences in histogram parameters based on DCE-MRI between HGG and CNSL were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. Short-term follow-up of patients was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis to explore the survival rates of HGG and CNSL. Results For the ROC curve analysis, we demonstrate that the 10th percentile of K-trans (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.912, sensitivity = 86.7%, specificity = 92.9%), K-ep (AUC = 0.940, sensitivity = 93.3%, specificity = 79.6%), V-e (AUC = 0.907, sensitivity = 86.7%, specificity = 89.3%), and AUC (AUC = 0.904, sensitivity = 86.7%, specificity = 92.9%) were significantly different between the CNSL and HGG groups (P < 0.001), with high diagnostic efficiency. Table 2 shows that the histogram features based on AUC maps (10th, 25th, median, 75th, 90th, and mean) were always significantly higher in the CNSL group than in the HGG group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in V-p or in the 75th, 90th and mean of K-trans, K-ep, and Ve between the CNSL and HGG groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion A histogram analysis of DCE-MRI identified significant differences between HGG and CNSL, and this will help in the clinical differential diagnosis of these conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1221 / 1227
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differentiating between Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-grade Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging with Histogram Analysis
    Murayama, Kazuhiro
    Nishiyama, Yuya
    Hirose, Yuichi
    Abe, Masato
    Ohyu, Shigeharu
    Ninomiya, Ayako
    Fukuba, Takashi
    Katada, Kazuhiro
    Toyama, Hiroshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 17 (01) : 42 - 49
  • [2] Differentiation of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-Grade Glioma with Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Liao, Weihua
    Liu, Yunhai
    Wang, Xiaoyi
    Jiang, Xinya
    Tang, Beisha
    Fang, Jiasheng
    Chen, Changqing
    Hu, Zhongliang
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2009, 50 (02) : 217 - 225
  • [3] Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters for high-grade glioma patients
    Ulyte, Agne
    Katsaros, Vasileios K.
    Liouta, Evangelia
    Stranjalis, Georgios
    Boskos, Christos
    Papanikolaou, Nickolas
    Usinskiene, Jurgita
    Bisdas, Sotirios
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2016, 58 (12) : 1197 - 1208
  • [4] Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters for high-grade glioma patients
    Agne Ulyte
    Vasileios K. Katsaros
    Evangelia Liouta
    Georgios Stranjalis
    Christos Boskos
    Nickolas Papanikolaou
    Jurgita Usinskiene
    Sotirios Bisdas
    Neuroradiology, 2016, 58 : 1197 - 1208
  • [5] Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma from high-grade glioma and brain metastasis using arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Xi, Yi-bin
    Kang, Xiao-wei
    Wang, Ning
    Liu, Ting-ting
    Zhu, Yuan-qiang
    Cheng, Guang
    Wang, Kai
    Li, Chen
    Guo, Fan
    Yin, Hong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 112 : 59 - 64
  • [6] Histogram analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of parotid tumors
    Shiyu Xiang
    Jiliang Ren
    Zhipeng Xia
    Ying Yuan
    Xiaofeng Tao
    BMC Medical Imaging, 21
  • [7] Histogram analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of parotid tumors
    Xiang, Shiyu
    Ren, Jiliang
    Xia, Zhipeng
    Yuan, Ying
    Tao, Xiaofeng
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [8] Diagnostic Utility of Integration of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MR Perfusion Employing Split Bolus Technique in Differentiating High-Grade Glioma
    Malik, Virender
    Kesavadas, Chandrasekharan
    Thomas, Bejoy
    Deepti, A. N.
    Kumar, K. Krishna
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2024, 34 (03): : 382 - 389
  • [9] Diffusion kurtosis imaging combined with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI in differentiating high-grade glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression
    Shi, Wenwei
    Qu, Chongxiao
    Wang, Xiaochun
    Liang, Xiao
    Tan, Yan
    Zhang, Hui
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 144
  • [10] Progress of radiological-pathological workflows in the differential diagnosis between primary central nervous system lymphoma and high-grade glioma
    Cao, Luming
    Zhang, Mengchao
    Zhang, Ying
    Ji, Bin
    Wang, Xuemei
    Wang, Xueju
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 49 (01)