Screening and Case-Finding Tools for the Detection of Dementia. Part II: Evidence-Based Meta-Analysis of Single-Domain Tests

被引:33
|
作者
Mitchell, Alex J. [1 ]
Malladi, Srinivasa [2 ]
机构
[1] Leicester Gen Hosp, Dept Liaison Psychiat, Brandon Unit, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
[2] Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Oundle, England
来源
关键词
Cognitive tests; screening; dementia; diagnosis; Alzheimer disease; verbal fluency; clock drawing test; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; CLOCK-DRAWING TEST; CONFIRMED FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA; EPISODIC MEMORY IMPAIRMENT; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; PRIMARY-CARE; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; QUESTIONABLE DEMENTIA; VASCULAR DEMENTIA; VERBAL FLUENCY;
D O I
10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181cdecd6
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic validity of single-domain cognitive tests for detecting dementia. These methods were defined as those that focus mainly on one domain of cognitive function such as orientation, memory, or executive function. Methods: A meta-analysis of robust studies was conducted. There were 15 categories of single-domain methods assessed in 45 analyses, including 27 performed head-to-head against the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Thirteen studies took place in community settings, 9 in primary care, and 23 in specialist settings. Results: In community settings, single-domain cognitive tests helped detect 64.2% of all dementias. In this setting, specificity (Sp) was 84.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 57.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 88.3%. This was significantly less accurate than the MMSE itself. The optimal individual method was the memory impairment screen (MIS). In primary care, the sensitivity (Se) and specificity of single-domain tests were 69.5% and 82.5%, respectively. The PPV and NPV were 36.5% and 95.8%. Considered together, these methods were less specific but equally sensitive as the MMSE when applied in primary care. Here, the most successful methods were the selective reminding test (SRT) and clock drawing test, the latter having data from independent samples. In specialist settings, single-domain methods had a Se of 76.6%, a Sp of 81.9%, a PPV 80.8%, and a NPV 74.9%. This represented almost equivalent accuracy to the MMSE. The optimal method for specialist settings (based on accuracy alone) was the memory alteration test. Conclusion: Brief single-domain methods offer diagnostic performance for detection of dementia that is surprisingly close to that offered by cognitive batteries such as the MMSE. As a method of screening or as part of a diagnostic algorithm, brief single-domain tests may be an efficient first step in identifying cognitive impairment. (Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 18:783-800)
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 800
页数:18
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Screening and Case Finding Tools for the Detection of Dementia. Part I: Evidence-Based Meta-Analysis of Multidomain Tests
    Mitchell, Alex J.
    Malladi, Srinivasa
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 18 (09): : 759 - 782
  • [2] Evidence-Based Case Management Practice-Part II: Meta-analysis A Primer for Case Managers
    Throckmorton, Terry
    Windle, Pamela E.
    PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 14 (05) : 226 - 232
  • [3] Foundation of Evidence-Based Decision Making for Health Care Managers-Part II Meta-analysis and Applying the Evidence
    Forrestal, Elizabeth J.
    HEALTH CARE MANAGER, 2014, 33 (03) : 230 - 244
  • [4] Meta-analysis of screening and case finding tools for depression in cancer: Evidence based recommendations for clinical practice on behalf of the Depression in Cancer Care consensus group
    Mitchell, Alex J.
    Meader, Nick
    Davies, Evan
    Clover, Kerrie
    Carter, Gregory L.
    Loscalzo, Matthew J.
    Linden, Wolfgang
    Grassi, Luigi
    Johansen, Christoffer
    Carlson, Linda E.
    Zabora, James
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2012, 140 (02) : 149 - 160
  • [5] Helicobacter pylori infection and risk for developing dementia: an evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies
    Liu, Nan-Yang
    Sun, Jia-Hui
    Jiang, Xue-Fan
    Li, Hao
    AGING-US, 2021, 13 (18): : 22571 - 22587
  • [6] Evaluating augmented reality as evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis of single-case design studies
    Denizli-Gulboy, Hicran
    Genc-Tosun, Derya
    Gulboy, Emrah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2023, 69 (04) : 472 - 486
  • [7] Investigating strategies to increase general education teachers' adherence to evidence-based social-emotional behavior practices: A meta-analysis of the single-case literature
    Merle, James L.
    Thayer, Andrew J.
    Larson, Madeline F.
    Pauling, Sydney
    Cook, Clayton R.
    Rios, Joseph A.
    McGinnis, Jenna L.
    Sullivan, Margaret M.
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 91 : 1 - 26