Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

被引:57
|
作者
Zhang, Jianping [1 ]
Cheng, Zhiyuan [2 ,4 ]
Ma, Yubao [1 ]
He, Caili [1 ]
Lu, Yongbin [1 ]
Zhao, Yaxue [1 ]
Chang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Zhang, Yawei [4 ]
Bai, Yana [1 ]
Cheng, Ning [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Epidemiol & Stat, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Basic Med Coll, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Basic Med Coll, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Colonoscopy; CRC; Incidence; Mortality; FECAL-OCCULT-BLOOD; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; COLONOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; SURVIVAL BENEFIT; MORTALITY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; COHORT; REDUCTION; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to evaluate on the effectiveness of screening modalities in the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence and deaths. General meta-analysis was performed to produce pooled estimates of the effect of CRC incidence and mortality using a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies from January 1992 to March 2016. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthetically compare the effectiveness of 5 frequently used screening modalities. A total of 44 studies with a focus on mortality from CRC using different screening methods were included. General meta-analysis showed that fecal immunohistochemical testing (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy, combination of fecal occult blood testing and FS screening respectively reduced CRC mortality by 59% (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.59), 33% (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.78), 61% (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.50), 38% (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91) compared with no screening, whereas guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) reduced CRC-related mortality by 14% (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90). Subgroup analysis showed that summary estimates of reduction in distal CRC mortality and proximal CRC mortality were 26% (95% CI, 62%-89%) and 10% (95% CI, 83%-98%). A network meta-analysis revealed rank probability analysis in which the colonoscopy had a 94.6% probability of being the most effective examination to reduce CRC mortality. In addition, the network meta-analysis estimated odds ratio, which was a 79% reduction (95% CI, 0.09-0.60) in CRC mortality when screening with FIT was compared with annual or biennial gFOBT and colonoscopy was approximately 80% more effective than gFOBT for reducing CRC mortality (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.130.54). Analysis of the effects of different screening methods showed that there was a significant reduction in the incidence of colon cancer, excluding gFOBT. This meta-analysis confirmed that gFOBT, FIT, FS, and colonoscopy were all effective in preventing CRC deaths and a major reduction in distal but not proximal CRC mortality was found. In addition, they were more effective in preventing CRC incidence in addition to gFOBT. The network meta-analysis suggests that colonoscopy is the most effective screening for preventing CRC deaths. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 263
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aspirin versus Screening for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: Comparative Effectiveness Network Meta-Analysis
    Emilsson, Louise
    Holme, Oeyvind
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Cook, Nancy R.
    Buring, Julie E.
    Loberg, Magnus
    Adami, Hans-Olov
    Sesso, Howard D.
    Gaziano, Michael
    Kalager, Mette
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S452 - S452
  • [2] Cost effectiveness analysis of three colorectal cancer screening modalities in Kuwait
    Nur, Amrizal Muhammad
    Aljunid, Syed Mohamed
    Tolma, Eleni L.
    Annaka, Mahmoud
    Alwotayan, Rihab
    Elbasmi, Amani
    Alali, Walid Q.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [3] Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna
    Ali, Muhammad Usman
    Warren, Rachel
    Kenny, Meghan
    Sherifali, Diana
    Raina, Parminder
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (04) : 298 - 313
  • [4] Still No Meta-Analysis of Screening Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer?
    van Rossum, Leo G. M.
    van Oijen, Martijn G. H.
    Regula, Jaroslaw
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2009, 54 (03) : 696 - 697
  • [5] Still No Meta-Analysis of Screening Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer?
    Leo G. M. van Rossum
    Martijn G. H. van Oijen
    Jaroslaw Regula
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2009, 54 : 696 - 697
  • [6] Comparing the effectiveness of competing tests for reducing colorectal cancer mortality: a network meta-analysis
    Elmunzer, B. Joseph
    Singal, Amit G.
    Sussman, Jeremy B.
    Deshpande, Amar R.
    Sussman, Daniel A.
    Conte, Marisa L.
    Dwamena, Ben A.
    Rogers, Mary A. M.
    Schoenfeld, Philip S.
    Inadomi, John M.
    Saini, Sameer D.
    Waljee, Akbar K.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (03) : 700 - U642
  • [7] A Network Meta-analysis to Explore the Effectiveness of the Different Treatment Modalities in Acne Scars
    Jiang, Min
    Liu, Tian
    Liu, Xiaoqiang
    Liu, Luojia
    Jiang, Xupin
    Zhang, Ze
    Kong, Meng
    Wu, Chao
    Zhang, Jiaping
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (05) : 1030 - 1036
  • [8] Screening Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic People: A Meta-Analysis
    Niv, Yaron
    Hazazi, Rachel
    Levi, Zohar
    Fraser, Gerald
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2008, 53 (12) : 3049 - 3054
  • [9] Screening Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic People: A Meta-Analysis
    Yaron Niv
    Rachel Hazazi
    Zohar Levi
    Gerald Fraser
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2008, 53
  • [10] Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for colorectal cancer
    Slivinskas, J
    Gagnon, Y
    Enns, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (10): : S328 - S329