One fundamental and two taxes: When does a Tobin tax reduce financial price volatility?

被引:22
|
作者
Deng, Yongheng [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xin [3 ]
Wei, Shang-Jin [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Wisconsin Sch Business, 975 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, FISF, 975 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Res Sch Finance Actuarial Studies & Stat, Kingsley St, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[4] Columbia Univ, Columbia Business Sch, FISF, 3022 Broadway, New York, NY 10027 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, NBER, 3022 Broadway, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Tobin tax; Transaction cost; Volatility; Speculation; Limits to arbitrage; SECURITIES TRANSACTION TAX; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; STOCK MARKETS; ASSET PRICES; COSTS; BEHAVIOR; LIMITS; EQUILIBRIUM; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.04.009
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We aim to make two contributions to the literature on the effects of transaction costs on financial price volatility. First, by augmenting a double differencing approach with a research design with three ingredients (a common set of companies simultaneously listed on two stock exchanges, binding capital controls, and different timing of changes in transaction costs), we obtain a control group that has identical corporate fundamentals as the treatment group. We apply the research design to Chinese stocks that are cross-listed in Hong Kong and Mainland China. Second, we allow transaction costs to have different effects in markets with different maturity. We find a significantly negative relationship, on average, between stamp duty increase and price volatility. However, this average effect masks some important heterogeneity. In particular, when institutional investors have become a significant part of the traders' pool, we find an opposite effect. Overall, our results suggest that a Tobin tax could work in an immature market, but can backfire in a more developed market. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 692
页数:30
相关论文
共 41 条