Detecting the Psychosis Prodrome Across High-Risk Populations Using Neuroanatomical Biomarkers

被引:106
|
作者
Koutsouleris, Nikolaos [1 ]
Riecher-Roessler, Anita [2 ]
Meisenzahl, Eva M. [1 ]
Smieskova, Renata [2 ]
Studerus, Erich [2 ]
Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana [1 ]
von Saldern, Sebastian [1 ]
Cabral, Carlos [1 ]
Reiser, Maximilian [3 ]
Falkai, Peter [1 ]
Borgwardt, Stefan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Psychiat, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Munich, Dept Radiol, D-80336 Munich, Germany
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
neuroanatomical biomarker; individualized risk stratification; cross-center; machine learning; ULTRA-HIGH-RISK; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; CLINICAL HIGH-RISK; GRAY-MATTER; PATTERN-CLASSIFICATION; 1ST-EPISODE PSYCHOSIS; HUMAN CEREBELLUM; MENTAL STATES; SCHIZOPHRENIA; VULNERABILITY;
D O I
10.1093/schbul/sbu078
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
To date, the MRI-based individualized prediction of psychosis has only been demonstrated in single-site studies. It remains unclear if MRI biomarkers generalize across different centers and MR scanners and represent accurate surrogates of the risk for developing this devastating illness. Therefore, we assessed whether a MRI-based prediction system identified patients with a later disease transition among 73 clinically defined high-risk persons recruited at two different early recognition centers. Prognostic performance was measured using cross-validation, independent test validation, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Transition outcomes were correctly predicted in 80% of test cases (sensitivity: 76%, specificity: 85%, positive likelihood ratio: 5.1). Thus, given a 54-month transition risk of 45% across both centers, MRI-based predictors provided a 36%-increase of prognostic certainty. After stratifying individuals into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups using the predictor's decision score, the high- vs low-risk groups had median psychosis-free survival times of 5 vs 51 months and transition rates of 88% vs 8%. The predictor's decision function involved gray matter volume alterations in prefrontal, perisylvian, and subcortical structures. Our results support the existence of a cross-center neuroanatomical signature of emerging psychosis enabling individualized risk staging across different high-risk populations. Supplementary results revealed that (1) potentially confounding between-site differences were effectively mitigated using statistical correction methods, and (2) the detection of the prodromal signature considerably depended on the available sample sizes. These observations pave the way for future multicenter studies, which may ultimately facilitate the neurobiological refinement of risk criteria and personalized preventive therapies based on individualized risk profiling tools.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 482
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immune and Infectious Biomarkers in Psychosis and Clinically High-Risk Psychosis Populations
    Delaney, Shannon
    Fallon, Brian
    Komorowski, Lars
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 83 (09) : S330 - S330
  • [2] IDENTIFYING BIOMARKERS OF RISK FOR AND PROGRESSION TO PSYCHOSIS USING HIGH-RISK STRATEGIES
    Cannon, Tyrone
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2014, 153 : S17 - S17
  • [3] Prediction of outcome in the psychosis prodrome using neuroanatomical pattern classification
    Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana
    Meisenzahl, Eva M.
    Cabral, Carlos
    von Saldern, Sebastian
    Kambeitz, Joseph
    Falkai, Peter
    Moeller, Hans-Juergen
    Reiser, Maximilian
    Koutsouleris, Nikolaos
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2016, 173 (03) : 159 - 165
  • [4] Inflammatory biomarkers in psychosis and clinical high risk populations
    Delaney, Shannon
    Fallon, Brian
    Alaedini, Armin
    Yolken, Robert
    Indart, Alyssa
    Feng, Tianshu
    Wang, Yuanjia
    Javitt, Daniel
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2019, 206 : 440 - 443
  • [5] Using Pattern Recognition to Identify and Validate Biomarkers for the Psychosis Prodrome
    Koutsouleris, Nikolaos
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 39 : S30 - S30
  • [6] In Search of Psychosis Biomarkers in High-risk Populations: Is the Mismatch Negativity the One We've Been Waiting for?
    Belger, Aysenil
    Yucel, Gunes H.
    Donkers, Franc C. L.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 71 (02) : 94 - 95
  • [7] Internalised stereotypes across ultra-high risk of psychosis and psychosis populations
    Pyle, Melissa
    Morrison, Anthony P.
    PSYCHOSIS-PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES, 2017, 9 (02): : 110 - 118
  • [8] Functional Connectivity Biomarkers of Psychosis in a Genetic High-Risk Population
    Bearden, Carrie
    Schleifer, Charlie
    Lin, Amy
    Kushan, Leila
    Ji, Jie Lisa
    Yang, Genevieve
    Anticevic, Alan
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 83 (09) : S37 - S37
  • [9] Neurocognitive and neuroanatomical maturation in the clinical high-risk states for psychosis: A pattern recognition study
    Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana
    Haas, Shalaila S.
    Meisenzahl, Eva
    Dwyer, Dominic B.
    Weiske, Johanna
    Peters, Henning
    Moeller, Hans-Juergen
    Falkai, Peter
    Koutsouleris, Nikolaos
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2019, 21 : 101624
  • [10] The schizophrenia prodrome: treatment and high-risk perspectives
    Cornblatt, B
    Lencz, T
    Obuchowski, M
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2002, 54 (1-2) : 177 - 186