How Can Firms' Basic Research Turn Into Product Innovation? The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Industry Appropriability

被引:48
作者
Martinez-Senra, Ana I. [1 ]
Quintas, Maria A. [1 ]
Sartal, Antonio [2 ]
Vazquez, Xose H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vigo, Dept Business Org & Mkt, Vigo 36310, Spain
[2] Univ Girona, Dept Org Business Management & Prod Design, Girona 17004, Spain
[3] Pompeu Fabra Univ, Dept Econ & Business, Barcelona 08005, Spain
关键词
Absorptive capacity; appropriability; basic research; product innovation; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INTERNATIONAL GENERATION; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; SCIENTIFIC-KNOWLEDGE; MODERATING ROLE; KNOW-HOW; TECHNOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; PERFORMANCE; SPILLOVERS;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2014.2386614
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We explain why companies seeking superior product innovation should invest in basic research. Our arguments highlight the role of absorptive capacity and examine how industry appropriability influences these relations. Based on a rich dataset of 8 416 firms, we argue that basic research in firms increases their knowledge stock and flows, therefore improving their capacity to identify, assimilate, and exploit external knowledge, which allows them to enhance their product innovation performance. We also verify that strong appropriability regimes not only reduce the effect of basic research on absorptive capacity, but also affect the relation between absorptive capacity and product innovation in two ways. In businesses with a high absorptive capacity, strong appropriability regimes exert a negative influence by reducing product innovation; however, businesses with a low absorptive capacity see their level of product innovation increase. This evidence not only throws into question the attitude of many managers toward basic research; it also calls for open reflection on both the net effect of appropriability on innovative performance and the stages of the innovation process to which public resources should be allocated.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 216
页数:12
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, The Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, V3rd
[3]   Innovation activities, use of appropriation instruments and absorptive capacity:: Evidence from Spanish firms [J].
Arbussa, Anna ;
Coenders, Germa .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (10) :1545-1558
[4]   Specialized technology suppliers, international spillovers and investment: evidence from the chemical industry [J].
Arora, A ;
Fosfuri, A ;
Gambardella, A .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2001, 65 (01) :31-54
[5]   EVALUATING TECHNOLOGICAL INFORMATION AND UTILIZING IT - SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE, TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITY, AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES IN BIOTECHNOLOGY [J].
ARORA, A ;
GAMBARDELLA, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1994, 24 (01) :91-114
[6]  
Arrow K., 1962, The rate and direction of inventive activity, DOI [10.1515/9781400879762-024, DOI 10.1515/9781400879762-024]
[7]  
Arruñada B, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P135
[8]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[9]   Innovation sources of large and small technology-based firms [J].
Bommer, M ;
Jalajas, DS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2004, 51 (01) :13-18
[10]   Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects [J].
Cao, Qing ;
Gedajlovic, Eric ;
Zhang, Hongping .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :781-796