Precise Relative Orbit Determination for Chinese TH-2 Satellite Formation Using Onboard GPS and BDS2 Observations

被引:8
|
作者
Yi, Bin [1 ]
Gu, Defeng [2 ,3 ]
Shao, Kai [2 ,4 ]
Ju, Bing [5 ]
Zhang, Houzhe [1 ]
Qin, Xianping [6 ]
Duan, Xiaojun [1 ]
Huang, Zhiyong [7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Liberal Arts & Sci, Changsha 410073, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, MOE Key Lab TianQin Mission, TianQin Res Ctr Gravitat Phys, Frontiers Sci Ctr TianQin,CNSA Res Ctr Gravitat W, Zhuhai Campus, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Artificial Intelligence, Zhuhai Campus, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Phys & Astron, Zhuhai Campus, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Aerosp Control Ctr, Natl Key Lab Sci & Technol Aerosp Flight Dynam, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[6] Xian Res Inst Surveying & Mapping, Xian 710054, Peoples R China
[7] Informat Engn Univ, Inst Surveying & Mapping, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TH-2; precise relative orbit determination; GPS; BDS2; GEO satellite; BASE-LINE DETERMINATION;
D O I
10.3390/rs13214487
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
TH-2 is China's first short-range satellite formation system used to realize interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) technology. In order to achieve the mission goal of InSAR processing, the relative orbit must be determined with high accuracy. In this study, the precise relative orbit determination (PROD) for TH-2 based on global positioning system (GPS), second-generation BeiDou navagation satellite system (BDS2), and GPS + BDS2 observations was performed. First, the performance of onboard GPS and BDS2 measurements were assessed by analyzing the available data, code multipath errors and noise levels of carrier phase observations. The differences between the National University of Defense Technology (NDT) and the Xi'an Research Institute of Surveying and Mapping (CHS) baseline solutions exhibited an RMS of 1.48 mm outside maneuver periods. The GPS-based orbit was used as a reference orbit to evaluate the BDS2-based orbit and the GPS + BDS2-based orbit. It is the first time BDS2 has been applied to the PROD of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite formation. The results showed that the root mean square (RMS) of difference between the PROD results using GPS and BDS2 measurements in 3D components was 2.89 mm in the Asia-Pacific region. We assigned different weights to geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) satellites to illustrate the impact of GEO satellites on PROD, and the accuracy of PROD was improved to 7.08 mm with the GEO weighting strategy. Finally, relative orbits were derived from the combined GPS and BDS2 data. When BDS2 was added on the basis of GPS, the average number of visible navigation satellites from TH-2A and TH-2B improved from 7.5 to 9.5. The RMS of the difference between the GPS + BDS2-based orbit and the GPS-based orbit was about 1.2 mm in 3D. The overlap comparison results showed that the combined orbit consistencies were below 1 mm in the radial (R), along-track (T), and cross-track (N) directions. Furthermore, when BDS2 co-worked with GPS, the average of the ambiguity dilution of precision (ADOP) reduced from 0.160 cycle to 0.153 cycle, which was about a 4.4% reduction. The experimental results indicate that millimeter-level PROD results for TH-2 satellite formation can be obtained by using onboard GPS and BDS2 observations, and multi-GNSS can further improve the accuracy and reliability of PROD.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Precise Orbit Determination and Maneuver Assessment for TH-2 Satellites Using Spaceborne GPS and BDS2 Observations
    Zhang, Houzhe
    Gu, Defeng
    Ju, Bing
    Shao, Kai
    Yi, Bin
    Duan, Xiaojun
    Huang, Zhiyong
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [2] Analysis of Precise Orbit Determination for the HY2D Satellite Using Onboard GPS/BDS Observations
    Peng, Hailong
    Zhou, Chongchong
    Zhong, Shiming
    Peng, Bibo
    Zhou, Xuhua
    Yan, Haoming
    Zhang, Jie
    Han, Jinyang
    Guo, Fengcheng
    Chen, Runjing
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [3] Precise orbit determination of the Fengyun-3C satellite using onboard GPS and BDS observations
    Li, Min
    Li, Wenwen
    Shi, Chuang
    Jiang, Kecai
    Guo, Xiang
    Dai, Xiaolei
    Meng, Xiangguang
    Yang, Zhongdong
    Yang, Guanglin
    Liao, Mi
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2017, 91 (11) : 1313 - 1327
  • [4] Precise orbit determination of the Fengyun-3C satellite using onboard GPS and BDS observations
    Min Li
    Wenwen Li
    Chuang Shi
    Kecai Jiang
    Xiang Guo
    Xiaolei Dai
    Xiangguang Meng
    Zhongdong Yang
    Guanglin Yang
    Mi Liao
    Journal of Geodesy, 2017, 91 : 1313 - 1327
  • [5] Precise Orbit Determination of the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES) Using Onboard GPS and BDS Observations
    Qing, Yun
    Lin, Jian
    Liu, Yang
    Dai, Xiaolei
    Lou, Yidong
    Gu, Shengfeng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (19) : 1 - 17
  • [6] Enhanced precise orbit determination for GPS and BDS-2/3 with real LEO onboard and ground observations
    Li, Min
    Wei, Kai
    Xu, Tianhe
    Shi, Yali
    Wang, Dixing
    MEASUREMENT, 2024, 224
  • [7] Precise orbit determination of the LuTan satellite using GPS, BDS-2, and BDS-3 signals
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhao, Qile
    Jiang, Kecai
    Guo, Xiang
    Lian, Yidu
    Li, Min
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 35 (09)
  • [8] Precise Orbit Determination for the FY-3C Satellite Using Onboard BDS and GPS Observations from 2013, 2015, and 2017
    Li, Xingxing
    Zhang, Keke
    Meng, Xiangguang
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhang, Xiaohong
    Li, Xin
    ENGINEERING, 2020, 6 (08) : 904 - 912
  • [9] Integrating BDS and GPS for precise relative orbit determination of LEO formation flying
    Bin YI
    Defeng GU
    Xiao CHANG
    Kai SHAO
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31 (10) : 2013 - 2022
  • [10] Integrating BDS and GPS for precise relative orbit determination of LEO formation flying
    Yi, Bin
    Gu, Defeng
    Chang, Xiao
    Shao, Kai
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2018, 31 (10) : 2013 - 2022