A comparison between human and machine labelling of image regions

被引:3
|
作者
Clark, AA [1 ]
Troscianko, T [1 ]
Campbell, NW [1 ]
Thomas, BT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Adv Comp Res Ctr, Perceptual Syst Res Ctr, Dept Expt Psychol, Bristol BS8 1UB, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1068/p2907
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
In previous work (Campbell et al, 1997 Pattern Recognition 30 555-563) a vision system was developed which is capable of classifying objects in outdoor scenes. The approach involves segmenting the image into regions, obtaining a feature-based description of each region, and then passing this description on to an artificial neural network (ANN) which has been trained to label the region with one of eleven possible object types. The question addressed here is: how important is each of these features to overall performance, both in human and machine vision? A set of experiments was conducted in which human subjects were trained in the same labelling task as the ANN. The stimuli, each depicting a single image region, were generated from a large database of urban and rural images. The subjects were then tested on both intact and degraded stimuli. The results suggest that certain features are particularly influential in mediating overall labelling performance. An equivalent experiment was carried out with the ANN. A method is presented which allows individual features to be corrupted in such a way as to simulate the loss of certain forms of visual information. The results, which are broadly similar to those found in the previous experiment, imply that the ANN can provide a useful model of human image region labelling. It is anticipated that the methodology, which draws on both computational and psychophysical techniques, will be of use to other areas of investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1138
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of human and machine assessments of image similarity for the organization of image databases
    Squire, DM
    Pun, T
    SCIA '97 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH SCANDINAVIAN CONFERENCE ON IMAGE ANALYSIS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 51 - 58
  • [2] Labelling Image Regions Using Wavelet Features and Spatial Prototypes
    Saathoff, Carsten
    Grzegorzek, Marcin
    Staab, Steffen
    SEMANTIC MULTIMEDIA, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5392 : 89 - 104
  • [3] Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for the Sequence Labelling Applications
    Amasyali, Mehmet Fatih
    Bilgin, Metin
    2015 23RD SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2015, : 503 - 506
  • [4] Recognition of the Electrolaryngeal Speech: Comparison Between Human and Machine
    Stanislav, Petr
    Psutka, Josef V.
    Psutka, Josef
    TEXT, SPEECH, AND DIALOGUE, TSD 2017, 2017, 10415 : 509 - 517
  • [5] Assessing agreement between human and machine clusterings of image databases
    Squire, DM
    Pun, T
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1998, 31 (12) : 1905 - 1919
  • [6] Geography of human capital in Italy: a comparison between macro-regions
    Baldissera, Alberto
    Cornali, Federica
    MODERN ITALY, 2020, 25 (03) : 261 - 277
  • [7] A combination of machine learning and image processing technologies for the classification of image regions
    Lattner, AD
    Miene, A
    Herzog, O
    ADAPTIVE MULTIMEDIA RETRIEVAL, 2004, 3094 : 185 - 199
  • [8] A Relevance Comparison between Interval and Prefix Labelling Schemes
    Al-khazraji, Samer
    North, Siobhan
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (ICET), 2017,
  • [9] Comparison of three radioligands for the labelling of human β-adrenoceptor subtypes
    Nadja Niclauß
    Martina B. Michel-Reher
    Astrid E. Alewijnse
    Martin C. Michel
    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, 2006, 374 : 99 - 105
  • [10] Comparison between two programs for image analysis, machine learning and subsequent classification
    Ribeiro, Gabrielly Pereira
    Endringer, Denise Coutinho
    De Andrade, Tadeu Uggere
    Lenz, Dominik
    TISSUE & CELL, 2019, 58 : 12 - 16