Adverse effects in hematologic malignancies treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

被引:31
|
作者
Luo, Wenjing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chenggong [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yinqiang [1 ,2 ]
Du, Mengyi [1 ,2 ]
Kou, Haiming [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Cong [1 ,2 ]
Mei, Heng [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Yu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Hematol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Clin Med Ctr Cell Therapy Neoplast Dis, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chimeric antigen receptor; Hematological malignancies; Hematologic toxicity; Meta-analysis; Review; EFFICACY; SAFETY; REMISSIONS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-021-09102-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Recently, chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T cell therapy for hematological malignancies has shown clinical efficacy. Hundreds of clinical trials have been registered and lots of studies have shown hematologic toxic effects were very common. The main purpose of this review is to systematically analyze hematologic toxicity in hematologic malignancies treated with CAR-T cell therapy. Methods We searched databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane up to January 2021. For safety analysis of overall hematologic toxicity, the rate of neutrophil, thrombocytopenia and anemia were calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed for age, pathological type, target antigen, co-stimulatory molecule, history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and prior therapy lines. The incidence rate of aspartate transferase (AST) increased, alanine transaminase (ALT) increased, serum creatine increased, APTT prolonged and fibrinogen decreased were also calculated. Results Overall, 52 studies involving 2004 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The incidence of any grade neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia was 80% (95% CI: 68-89%), 61% (95% CI: 49-73%), and 68% (95%CI: 54-80%) respectively. The incidences of grade >= 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia were 60% (95% CI: 49-70%), 33% (95% CI: 27-40%), and 32% (95%CI: 25-40%) respectively. According to subgroup analysis and the corresponding Z test, hematological toxicity was more frequent in younger patients, in patients with >= 4 median lines of prior therapy and in anti-CD19 cases. The subgroup analysis of CD19 CAR-T cell constructs showed that 41BB resulted in less hematological toxicity than CD28. Conclusion CAR-T cell therapy has dramatical efficacy in hematological malignancies, but the relevant adverse effects remain its obstacle. The most common >= 3 grade side effect is hematological toxicity, and some cases die from infections or severe hemorrhage in early period. In long-term follow-up, hematological toxicity is less life-threatening generally and most suffered patients recover to adequate levels after 3 months. To prevent life-threatening infections or bleeding events, clinicians should pay attention to intervention of hematological toxicity in the early process of CAR-T cell therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adverse effects in hematologic malignancies treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Wenjing Luo
    Chenggong Li
    Yinqiang Zhang
    Mengyi Du
    Haiming Kou
    Cong Lu
    Heng Mei
    Yu Hu
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [2] Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) Therapy for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: Efficacy and Safety-A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Yu, Wen-Liang
    Hua, Zi-Chun
    CANCERS, 2019, 11 (01):
  • [3] Cardiotoxicity Associated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cell Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies: A Systematic Review
    Hanna, Kerollos S.
    Kaur, Harkirat
    Alazzeh, Mohammad S.
    Thandavaram, Abhay
    Channar, Aneeta
    Purohit, Ansh
    Shrestha, Bijay
    Patel, Deepkumar
    Shah, Hriday
    Mohammed, Lubna
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [4] Patient-reported outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Park, Hyo Jung
    Jeong, Hyunsuk
    Yim, Hyeon Woo
    Kim, Na Jin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] The efficacy and safety of CD7 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Jile
    An, Yuxin
    Sun, Rui
    Zhang, Xiaomei
    Guo, Shujing
    Gao, Xuejin
    Zhao, Mingfeng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 14
  • [6] Cardiac adverse events after Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapies: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Maleki, Saba
    Esmaeili, Zahra
    Seighali, Niloofar
    Shafiee, Arman
    Namin, Sara Montazeri
    Zavareh, Mohammad Amin Tofighi
    Khamene, Sima Shamshiri
    Mohammadkhawajah, Izat
    Nanna, Michael
    Alizadeh-asl, Azin
    M.Kwan, Jennifer
    Hosseini, Kaveh
    CARDIO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [7] Infections after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies
    Kampouri, Eleftheria
    Little, Jessica S.
    Rejeski, Kai
    Manuel, Oriol
    Hammond, Sarah P.
    Hill, Joshua A.
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2023, 25
  • [8] Infections after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies
    Kampouri, Eleftheria
    Little, Jessica S.
    Rejeski, Kai
    Manuel, Oriol
    Hammond, Sarah P.
    Hill, Joshua A.
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2023, 25
  • [9] Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies: A Practical Review
    Strati, Paolo
    Gregory, Tara
    Majhail, Navneet S.
    Jain, Nitin
    JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2023, 19 (09) : 706 - +
  • [10] Risks and Benefits of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Grigor, Emma J. M.
    Fergusson, Dean
    Kekre, Natasha
    Montroy, Joshua
    Atkins, Harold
    Seftel, Matthew D.
    Daugaard, Mads
    Presseau, Justin
    Thavom, Kednapa
    Hutton, Brian
    Holt, Robert A.
    Lalu, Manoj M.
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2019, 33 (02) : 98 - 110