Tweeting #RamNavami: A Comparison of Approaches to Analyzing Bipartite Networks

被引:0
|
作者
Heaney, Michael T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Adam Smith Bldg, Glasgow G12 8RT, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Bipartite network; two-mode network; ERGM; REM; Twitter; Ram Navami;
D O I
10.1177/22779752211018010
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Bipartite networks, also known as two-mode networks or affiliation networks, are a class of networks in which actors or objects are partitioned into two sets, with interactions taking place across but not within sets. These networks are omnipresent in society, encompassing phenomena such as student-teacher interactions, coalition structures and international treaty participation. With growing data availability and proliferation in statistical estimators and software, scholars have increasingly sought to understand the methods available to model the data-generating processes in these networks. This article compares three methods for doing so: (a) Logit (b) the bipartite Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) and (c) the Relational Event Model (REM). This comparison demonstrates the relevance of choices with respect to dependence structures, temporality, parameter specification and data structure. Considering the example of Ram Navami, a Hindu festival celebrating the birth of Lord Ram, the ego network of tweets using #RamNavami on 21April 2021 is examined. The results of the analysis illustrate that critical modelling choices make a difference in the estimated parameters and the conclusions to be drawn from them.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Novel approaches for analyzing biological networks
    Balasundaram, B
    Butenko, S
    Trukhanov, S
    JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 10 (01) : 23 - 39
  • [2] Novel Approaches for Analyzing Biological Networks
    Balabhaskar Balasundaram
    Sergiy Butenko
    Svyatoslav Trukhanov
    Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2005, 10 : 23 - 39
  • [3] GRAPH PARTITIONING APPROACHES FOR ANALYZING BIOLOGICAL NETWORKS
    Fan, Neng
    Pardalos, P. M.
    Chinchuluun, A.
    BIOMAT 2009, 2010, : 250 - +
  • [4] On two approaches to analyzing consensus in complex networks
    Wu, Chai Wah
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-11, 2007, : 2638 - 2641
  • [5] A comparison of regression approaches for analyzing clustered data
    Desai, Manisha
    Begg, Melissa D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 98 (08) : 1425 - 1429
  • [6] Comparison of four different visibility analyzing approaches
    Shu Ju Cai Ji Yu Chu Li, 1 (122-127):
  • [7] Computational Approaches for Analyzing Information Flow in Biological Networks
    Kholodenko, Boris
    Yaffe, Michael B.
    Kolch, Walter
    SCIENCE SIGNALING, 2012, 5 (220)
  • [8] Analyzing Various Social Networking Approaches for Covert Networks
    Karthika, S.
    Bose, S.
    TRENDS IN NETWORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS, 2011, 197 : 558 - 566
  • [9] Innovation Networks. New Approaches in Modelling and Analyzing
    Ciarli, Tommaso
    JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2010, 13 (01):
  • [10] Comparison of methods for the detection of node group membership in bipartite networks
    Sawardecker, E. N.
    Amundsen, C. A.
    Sales-Pardo, M.
    Amaral, L. A. N.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2009, 72 (04): : 671 - 677