Overcoming Systems Factors in Case Logging with Artificial Intelligence Tools

被引:4
|
作者
Thanawala, Ruchi [1 ]
Jesneck, Jonathan [2 ]
Shelton, Julia [3 ]
Rhee, Rebecca [4 ]
Seymour, Neal E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Sect Thorac Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Firefly Lab LLC, Lake Oswego, OR USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Surg, Div Pediat Surg, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Maimonides Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Colorectal Surg, Brooklyn, NY USA
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Baystate Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Med Sch, Springfield, MA USA
关键词
Surgical education; Quantitative Data in Medical Education; ACGME operative logs; Machine Learning; Reinforcement Learning; Artificial Intelligence;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.01.013
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Case logs are foundational data in surgical education, yet cases are consistently underreported. Logging behavior is driven by multiple human and systems factors, including time constraints, ease of case data retrieval, access to data-entry tools, and procedural code decision tools. METHODS: We examined case logging trends at three mid-sized, general surgery training programs from September 2016-October 2020, January 2019-October 2020 and May 2019-October 2020, respectively. Across the programs we compared the number of cases logged per week when residents logged directly to ACGME versus via a resident education platform with machine learning based case logging assistance tools. We examined case logging patterns across 4 consecutive phases: baseline default ACGME logging prior to platform access (P0 "Manual "), full platform logging assistance (P1 "Assisted "), partial platform assistance requiring manual data entry without data integrations (P2 "Notebook "), and resumed fully integrated platform with logging assistance (P3 "Resumed "). RESULTS: 31,385 cases were logged utilizing the platform since 2016 by 171 residents across the 3 programs. Intelligent case logging assistance significantly increased case logging rates, from 1.44 +/- 1.48 cases by manual entry in P0 to 4.77 +/- 2.45 cases per resident per week via the platform in P1 (p-value < 0.00001). Despite the burden of manual data entry when the platform's data connectivity was paused, the tool helped to increase overall case logging into ACGME to 2.85 +/- 2.37 cases per week (p-value = 0.0002). Upon resuming the data case levels rose to 4.54 +/- 3.33 cases per week via the platform, equivalent to P1 levels (insignificant difference, p-value = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Mapping the influence of systems and human factors in high-quality case logs allows us to target interventions to continually improve the training of surgical residents. System level factors such as access to alternate automation-drive tools and operative schedule integrated platforms to assist in ACGME case log has a significant impact on the number of cases captured in logs. (C) 2022 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1030
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Actionable artificial intelligence: Overcoming barriers to adoption of prediction tools
    Balch, Jeremy A.
    Loftus, Tyler J.
    SURGERY, 2023, 174 (03) : 730 - 732
  • [2] Artificial intelligence tools for decision support systems
    RosenthalSabroux, C
    Zarate, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 103 (02) : 275 - 276
  • [3] Decision Support Tools, Systems, and Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Imaging
    Massalha, Samia
    Clarkin, Owen
    Thornhill, Rebecca
    Wells, Glenn
    Chow, Benjamin J. W.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 34 (07) : 827 - 838
  • [4] Artificial Intelligence Systems as Prognostic and Predictive Tools in Ovarian Cancer
    A. Enshaei
    C. N. Robson
    R. J. Edmondson
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 22 : 3970 - 3975
  • [5] Artificial Intelligence Systems as Prognostic and Predictive Tools in Ovarian Cancer
    Enshaei, A.
    Robson, C. N.
    Edmondson, R. J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (12) : 3970 - 3975
  • [6] Mathematical Modelling Abilities of Artificial Intelligence Tools: The Case of ChatGPT
    Spreitzer, Carina
    Straser, Oliver
    Zehetmeier, Stefan
    Maass, Katja
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [7] Automating metadata logging through artificial intelligence
    Witmayer C.
    SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal, 2019, 128 (09): : 34 - 39
  • [8] Tools and techniques of artificial intelligence
    Russell, I
    Haller, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2003, 17 (05) : 685 - 687
  • [9] Improving Tools in Artificial Intelligence
    Garrido, Angel
    BRAIN-BROAD RESEARCH IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 1 (01): : 43 - 48
  • [10] Artificial intelligence tools utilized in nursing education: Incidence and associated factors
    Jallad, Samar Thabet
    Alsaqer, Khitam
    Albadareen, Baker Ishaq
    Al-maghaireh, Duaa
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 142