On Combining Family-Based and Population-Based Case-Control Data in Association Studies

被引:8
|
作者
Zheng, Yingye [1 ]
Heagerty, Patrick J. [1 ,2 ]
Hsu, Li [1 ]
Newcomb, Polly A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Biostat & Biomath Program, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Canc Prevent Program, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Conditional likelihood; Family studies; Outcome-dependent sampling; Population-based case-control; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CANDIDATE GENES; MODELS; EFFICIENCY; INFERENCE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01393.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Combining data collected from different sources can potentially enhance statistical efficiency in estimating effects of environmental or genetic factors or gene-environment interactions. However, combining data across studies becomes complicated when data are collected under different study designs, such as family-based and unrelated individual-based case-control design. In this article, we describe likelihood-based approaches that permit the joint estimation of covariate effects on disease risk under study designs that include cases, relatives of cases, and unrelated individuals. Our methods accommodate familial residual correlation and a variety of ascertainment schemes. Extensive simulation experiments demonstrate that the proposed methods for estimation and inference perform well in realistic settings. Efficiencies of different designs are contrasted in the simulation. We applied the methods to data from the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1033
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Methods for Combining Case-Control and Family-Based Association Studies
    Glaser, Beate
    Holmans, Peter
    HUMAN HEREDITY, 2009, 68 (02) : 106 - 116
  • [2] Comparison of methods for combining case-control and family-based association studies
    Glaser, Beate
    Holmans, Peter
    ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2007, 71 : 558 - 558
  • [3] Leveraging Family History in Population-Based Case-Control Association Studies
    Ghosh, Arpita
    Hartge, Patricia
    Kraft, Peter
    Joshi, Amit D.
    Ziegler, Regina G.
    Barrdahl, Myrto
    Chanock, Stephen J.
    Wacholder, Sholom
    Chatterjee, Nilanjan
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 38 (02) : 114 - 122
  • [4] metaFARVAT: An Efficient Tool for Meta-Analysis of Family-Based, Case-Control, and Population-Based Rare Variant Association Studies
    Wang, Longfei
    Lee, Sungyoung
    Qiao, Dandi
    Cho, Michael H.
    Silverman, Edwin K.
    Lange, Christoph
    Won, Sungho
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2019, 10
  • [5] Comparison of methods for combining case-control with family-based association and linkage samples
    Glaser, B.
    Holmans, P.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 31 (06) : 627 - 628
  • [6] Sample size calculations for population- and family-based case-control association studies on marker genotypes
    Pfeiffer, RM
    Gail, MH
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 25 (02) : 136 - 148
  • [7] Ascertainment bias in family-based case-control studies
    Siegmund, KD
    Langholz, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 155 (09) : 875 - 880
  • [8] Combining multiple family-based association studies
    Hua Tang
    Jie Peng
    Pei Wang
    Marc Coram
    Li Hsu
    BMC Proceedings, 1 (Suppl 1)
  • [9] Family-based linkage and case control association studies
    Ho, Daniel W. H.
    Chan, Danny
    Cheung, Kenneth M. C.
    Sham, Pak
    Song, You-Qiang
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 22 (04): : 245 - 250
  • [10] Family-based association tests for sequence data, and comparisons with population-based association tests
    Iuliana Ionita-Laza
    Seunggeun Lee
    Vladimir Makarov
    Joseph D Buxbaum
    Xihong Lin
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2013, 21 : 1158 - 1162