Our neoliberal fantasies? A preliminary test of research trends in leading journals in work and organizational psychology

被引:6
|
作者
Anseel, Frederik [1 ]
Van Lysebetten, Saar [2 ]
Van Es, Roeliene [2 ]
Rosseel, Julie [2 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Kings Business Sch, London, England
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Personnel Management Work & Org Psychol, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Work and organizational psychology; neoliberal; review; meta-analysis; philosophy of science;
D O I
10.1080/1359432X.2018.1496082
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Prior to engaging in a substantive discussion on the supposed influence of neoliberalism on research in work and organizational psychology (WOP), it is important to verify the empirical basis of the trends advanced by Bal and Doci (Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology [Online First Publication, 2018]). To this end, we content analysed 745 abstracts of empirical studies published in leading WOP journals during the years 2006-2007 and 2016-2017. Results of our content analysis do not support the hypothesized trends towards more instrumentality and individualism in WOP research, suggesting that Bal and Doci's (2018) portrayal of the WOP literature does not provide a solid basis for discussion. On the basis of our findings, we conclude with recommendations to broaden the scope of WOP research to also include macro-level, societal issues.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 551
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条