Comparative Analysis of Different Single Cell Metamaterial

被引:0
|
作者
Katiyar, Pankaj Rameshchandra [1 ]
Mahadi, Wan Nor Liza Binti Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Engn, Dept Elect Engn, EMRD, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
ABSORPTION; SUBSTRATE; ANTENNAS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-07674-4_29
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Artificially constructed metamaterial have become of considerable interest due to their negative properties. Under normal circumstance the electromagnetic energy inside metamaterial flows in the reverse direction. In this research, we compare seven different metamaterial structures against their negative frequency, simulation time, memory requirement and mesh cell. We also present a comparative analysis on tunability of single cell metamaterial structure to a different frequency band of interest. To come up with proper analysis we have restricted cell size of 2.5 mm x 2.5 mm and simulated structure from 0 Hz to 20 GHz. SRR structure has a negative frequency response in a lower band while Jerusalem cross takes less simulation time. S structure has lowest memory and mesh cell requirement, but it is hard to tune. However, CLS loaded split ring resonator has advantages over all the parameters of comparison and is found best.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 298
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of single-cell modeling of periodic metamaterial structures
    Bandlow, Bastian
    Schuhmann, Rolf
    Lubkowski, Grzegorz
    Weiland, Thomas
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2008, 44 (06) : 1662 - 1665
  • [2] Comparative analysis of cell–cell communication at single-cell resolution
    Aaron J. Wilk
    Alex K. Shalek
    Susan Holmes
    Catherine A. Blish
    Nature Biotechnology, 2024, 42 : 470 - 483
  • [3] A 1 YEAR COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SINGLE NEEDLE PLATELETPHERESIS PROCEDURES PERFORMED ON TWO DIFFERENT CELL SEPARATORS
    Gupta, M.
    Mehta, N.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2012, 103 : 106 - 106
  • [4] Comparative proteomic analysis of different tick cell lines
    Loginov, D.
    Loginova, Y.
    Vechtova, P.
    Sterba, J.
    FEBS OPEN BIO, 2018, 8 : 461 - 462
  • [5] Comparative analysis of cell-cell communication at single-cell resolution
    Wilk, Aaron J.
    Shalek, Alex K.
    Holmes, Susan
    Blish, Catherine A.
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 42 (03) : 470 - 483
  • [6] Comparative Single-Cell Analysis of Different E. coli Expression Systems during Microfluidic Cultivation
    Binder, Dennis
    Probst, Christopher
    Gruenberger, Alexander
    Hilgers, Fabienne
    Loeschcke, Anita
    Jaeger, Karl-Erich
    Kohlheyer, Dietrich
    Drepper, Thomas
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [7] COMPARATIVE PROTEOMIC ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT INVASIVE OSTEOSARCOMA CELL LINES
    Hong, D.
    Zhang, L. W.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 29 : S484 - S484
  • [8] A Comparative Analysis for Different Kinds of Single Diode Model Photovoltaic Module
    Besheer, Ahmad H.
    Abdelaziz, Almoataz Y.
    2014 IEEE INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES - ASIA (ISGT ASIA), 2014, : 41 - 46
  • [9] Comparative Analysis of Different Single-Diode PV Modeling Methods
    Shongwe, Samkeliso
    Hanif, Moin
    IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2015, 5 (03): : 938 - 946
  • [10] Comparative analysis between different approaches for single-phase PLLs
    Monteiro L.F.C.
    Pinto J.G.
    Monteiro V.
    Couto C.
    Afonso J.
    International Journal of Power Electronics, 2022, 16 (01) : 34 - 60