共 50 条
Randomised controlled trial of adjunctive inspiratory muscle training for patients with COPD
被引:76
|作者:
Charususin, Noppawan
[1
,2
,3
]
Gosselink, Rik
[1
,2
]
Decramer, Marc
[1
]
Demeyer, Heleen
[1
,2
]
McConnell, Alison
[4
]
Saey, Didier
[5
]
Maltais, Francois
[5
]
Derom, Eric
[6
]
Vermeersch, Stefanie
[6
]
Heijdra, Yvonne F.
[7
]
van Helvoort, Hanneke
[7
]
Garms, Linda
[7
]
Schneeberger, Tessa
[8
]
Kenn, Klaus
[8
,9
]
Gloeckl, Rainer
[8
,10
]
Langer, Daniel
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Resp Rehabil & Resp Div, Leuven, Belgium
[2] KU Leuven Univ Leuven, Dept Rehabil Sci, Fac Movement & Rehabil Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Thammasat Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Pathum Thani, Thailand
[4] Bournemouth Univ, Dept Human Sci & Publ Hlth, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Bournemouth, Dorset, England
[5] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Ctr Rech, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Ghent, Belgium
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pulm Dis, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[8] Schoen Klin Berchtesgadener Land, Dept Resp Med & Pulm Rehabil, Schoenau, Germany
[9] UGMLC, German Ctr Lung Res DZL, Giessen, Germany
[10] TUM, Dept Prevent Rehabil & Sports Med, Munich, Germany
来源:
关键词:
OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE;
IMPROVE EXERCISE TOLERANCE;
RESPIRATORY MUSCLES;
IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE;
REHABILITATION;
WALKING;
DISORDERS;
CAPACITY;
DISTANCE;
DYSPNEA;
D O I:
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211417
中图分类号:
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background This study aimed to investigate whether adjunctive inspiratory muscle training (IMT) can enhance the well-established benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with COPD. Methods 219 patients with COPD (FEVI: 42%+/- 16% predicted) with inspiratory muscle weakness (Plmax: 51 +/- 15 cm H2O) were randomised into an intervention group (IMT+PR; n=110) or a control group (ShamIMT- PR; n=109) in this double-blind, multicentre randomised controlled trial between February 2012 and October 2016 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01397396). Improvement in 6 min walking distance (6MWD) was a priori defined as the primary outcome. Prespecified secondary outcomes included respiratory muscle function and endurance cycling time. Findings No significant differences between the intervention group (n=89) and the control group (n=85) in improvements in 6MWD were observed (0.3 m, 95% CI 13 to 14, p=0.967). Patients who completed assessments in the intervention group achieved larger gains in inspiratory muscle strength (effect size: 1.07, p<0.001) and endurance (effect size: 0.79, p<0.001) than patients in the control group. 75s additional improvement in endurance cycling time (95% CI 1 to 149, p=0.048) and significant reductions in Borg dyspnoea score at isotime during the cycling test (95% CI 1.5 to 0.01, p=0.049) were observed in the intervention group. Interpretation Improvements in respiratory muscle function after adjunctive IMT did not translate into additional improvements in 6MWD (primary outcome). Additional gains in endurance time and reductions in symptoms of dyspnoea were observed during an endurance cycling test (secondary outcome)
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 950
页数:9
相关论文