The role of sexism in voting in the 2016 presidential election

被引:66
|
作者
Bock, Jarrod [1 ]
Byrd-Craven, Jennifer [1 ]
Burkley, Melissa [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
Hostile sexism; Attitudes toward women; Political psychology; Social cognition; GENDER STEREOTYPES; BENEVOLENT SEXISM; REFLECTED-GLORY; AGENTIC WOMEN; ATTITUDES; POLITICS; PREJUDICES; BACKLASH; BASKING; HOSTILE;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.026
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The 2016 presidential election was one of the most politically charged and volatile elections in recent history. The election also saw its first female candidate, Hillary Clinton, represent a major political party. Prior research is inconclusive on how biases can affect political outcomes, with some research showing that racism has affected presidential elections, while others have shown that sexism does not affect elections. However, agentic women often face discrimination and backlash when seeking positions of power. The current study sought to extend past work by examining the potential role of sexism in the 2016 election. After controlling for participant sex, time of participation, and political party identification, it was found that individual differences in hostile sexism and traditional attitudes toward women significantly predicted voting for Donald Trump. These results suggest that voter attitudes toward women may have played a role in the election.outcome. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 193
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hostile Sexism and the 2016 Presidential Election
    Owen, Ann L.
    Wei, Andrew
    EASTERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2024, 50 (03) : 238 - 258
  • [2] Ageism and Sexism in the 2016 United States Presidential Election
    Lytle, Ashley
    Macdonald, Jamie
    Dyar, Christina
    Levy, Sheri R.
    ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2018, 18 (01) : 81 - 104
  • [3] Ready for Hillary?: Explicit and Implicit Sexism in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Barnello, Michelle A.
    Bitecofer, Rachel
    Kidd, Quentin
    FORUM-A JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN CONTEMPORARY POLITICS, 2019, 17 (02): : 295 - 313
  • [4] Comparing voting methods: 2016 US presidential election
    Igersheim, Herrade
    Durand, Francois
    Hamlin, Aaron
    Laslier, Jean-Francois
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, 71
  • [5] Engendering support: Hostile sexism predicts voting for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election
    Ratliff, Kate A.
    Redford, Liz
    Conway, John
    Smith, Colin Tucker
    GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2019, 22 (04) : 578 - 593
  • [6] Is Sexism for White People? Gender Stereotypes, Race, and the 2016 Presidential Election
    Bracic, Ana
    Israel-Trummel, Mackenzie
    Shortle, Allyson F.
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2019, 41 (02) : 281 - 307
  • [7] Is Sexism for White People? Gender Stereotypes, Race, and the 2016 Presidential Election
    Ana Bracic
    Mackenzie Israel-Trummel
    Allyson F. Shortle
    Political Behavior, 2019, 41 : 281 - 307
  • [8] VOTING IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
    Olshansky, Ellen
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2008, 24 (06) : 327 - 328
  • [9] Threat, trust, and Trump: identity and voting in the 2016 presidential election
    Blankenship, Benjamin T.
    Stewart, Abigail J.
    POLITICS GROUPS AND IDENTITIES, 2019, 7 (03) : 724 - 736
  • [10] Obesity Prevalence and Voting Behaviors in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    An, Ruopeng
    Ji, Mengmeng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2018, 42 (05): : 21 - 31