Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control policies in Poland: legal aspects and industry practices

被引:23
|
作者
Balwicki, Lukasz [1 ]
Stoklosa, Michal [2 ]
Balwicka-Szczyrba, Malgorzata [3 ]
Tomczak, Wioleta [4 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Gdansk, Dept Publ Hlth & Social Med, Gdansk, Poland
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Econ & Hlth Policy Res, 250 Williams St, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Univ Gdansk, Dept Civil Law, Gdansk, Poland
[4] Med Univ Gdansk, Dept Oncol Propedeut, Gdansk, Poland
关键词
Tobacco industry; Tobacco industry documents; Public policy; ILLICIT TRADE; TAX;
D O I
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Since 2006, when Poland ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), there have been efforts to improve tobacco control regulation in the country. At the same time, at the European Union level, Poland took part in discussions over revision of the Tobacco Tax Directive and the Tobacco Products Directive. This study aims to explore the tobacco industry's tactics to interfere with the creation of those policies. Methods Analysis of 257 documents obtained through freedom of information request. Results We identified three means that the tobacco industry used to interfere with tobacco control policies: creating a positive attitude, expressing a will to be a part of the policymaking process, and exerting pressure. We found that those tactics have often been used unethically, with the industry providing the government with ready legislation proposals, overstating its contribution to the economy and the government revenues, misrepresenting the illicit cigarette problem and misusing scientific evidence. The industry also used legal threats, including use of bilateral trade agreements, against implementation of tobacco control measures. The companies lobbied together directly and through third parties, with the cigarette excise tax structure being the only area of disagreement among the companies. The industry also pushed the Polish government to challenge tobacco control policies in countries with stronger public policy standards, including UK display bans and the Australian plain-packaging law. Conclusions From an object of regulation, the tobacco industry in Poland became a partner with the government in legislative work. Implementation of provisions of Article 5.3 of the WHO FCTC could prevent further industry interference.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 526
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Undue tobacco industry interference in tobacco control policies in Mexico
    Madrazo-Lajous, Alejandro
    Guerrero-Alcantara, Angela
    SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 2012, 54 (03): : 315 - 322
  • [2] The Observatory of Tobacco Industry Strategies: a new perspective for monitoring the industry's interference in tobacco control policies in Brazil and the world
    Barretto Turci, Silvana Rubano
    Medeiros, Alex
    Carvalho, Daniel da Costa E. Silva
    Cavalcante, Tania Maria
    Bialous, Stella Aguinaga
    Johns, Paula
    da Costa E Silva, Vera Luiza
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2017, 33
  • [3] Tobacco industry interference in price and tax policies in Kenya: Analysis of tobacco industry internal communication documents
    Kendagor, Anne
    TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2018, 16 : 42 - 42
  • [4] Tobacco industry interference with the 2017 Thai Tobacco Product Control Act
    Charoenca, N.
    Limstit, P.
    Pipattanachat, V.
    Kungskulniti, N.
    Hamann, S.
    TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2018, 16 : 254 - 254
  • [5] Development of a model of the tobacco industry's interference with tobacco control programmes
    Trochim, WMK
    Stillman, FA
    Clark, PI
    Schmitt, CL
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2003, 12 (02) : 140 - 147
  • [6] The Observatory of Tobacco Industry Strategies: a new perspective for monitoring the industry's interference in tobacco control policies in Brazil and the world (vol 33, 2017)
    Barretto Turci, Silvana Rubano
    Kornalewski, Alex Medeiros
    da Costa e Silva Carvalho, Daniel
    Cavalcante, Tania Maria
    Bialous, Stella Aguinaga
    Johns, Paula
    da Costa e Silva, Vera Luiza
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2018, 34 (01):
  • [7] Tobacco Industry Manipulation of Tobacco Excise and Tobacco Advertising Policies in the Czech Republic: An Analysis of Tobacco Industry Documents
    Shirane, Risako
    Smith, Katherine
    Ross, Hana
    Silver, Karin E.
    Williams, Simon
    Gilmore, Anna
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (06):
  • [8] Tobacco industry versus tobacco control
    不详
    LANCET, 2012, 379 (9830): : 1924 - 1924
  • [9] Back to the future: tobacco industry interference, evidence and the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
    Wakefield, Melanie
    Liberman, Jonathan
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2008, 17 (03) : 145 - 146
  • [10] Legal cannabis industry adopting strategies of the tobacco industry
    Subritzky, Todd
    Lenton, Simon
    Pettigrew, Simone
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2016, 35 (05) : 511 - 513