Multicenter Evaluation of a Gradient Diffusion Method for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter pylori

被引:2
|
作者
Shakir, Salika M. [1 ,4 ]
Otiso, Joshua [2 ]
Keller, George [2 ,5 ]
Van Heule, Hillary [2 ]
Osborn, Lucas J. [2 ]
Cole, Nicolynn [3 ]
Schuetz, Audrey N. [3 ]
Richter, Sandra S. [2 ,6 ]
Couturier, Marc Roger [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Lab Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Rochester, MN USA
[4] ARUP Inst Clin & Expt Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
[5] Akron Childrens Hosp, Akron, OH 44308 USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
来源
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM | 2022年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
Helicobacter pylori; antimicrobial susceptibility; Etest; agar dilution; fastidious isolates organism; method comparison; AGAR DILUTION METHOD; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; TRIPLE THERAPY; CLARITHROMYCIN;
D O I
10.1128/spectrum.02111-21
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Helicobacter pylori is an important human pathogen associated with peptic ulcer disease, dyspepsia, and gastric malignancy. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is often requested for patients who fail eradication therapy. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference method, agar dilution (AD), is not performed in most laboratories and maintaining organism viability during transit to a reference laboratory is difficult. We assessed the performance of the Etest (bioMerieux) as a method for H. pylori AST in comparison to AD. Etest MICs were determined for 83 H. pylori isolates at ARUP and Cleveland Clinic (CC). Categorical agreement (CA), very major, major, and minor errors (VME, ME, and mE) were determined for Etest using AD performed at Mayo Clinic Laboratories as the reference method. Testing on isolates with errors was repeated to determine final results summarized below. For clarithromycin, 66.3% of isolates were resistant (R) by AD; Etest results at each laboratory showed 1mE (12%) and 1 ME (3.8%). For tetracycline, only 2 isolates were R by AD; a single VME occurred at both sites (98.8% CA, 50% VME) with the same isolate. Applying EUCAST levofloxacin breakpoints to interpret ciprofloxacin results, 60.2% of isolates were R by AD; ARUP CA was 97.6% (1 ME (3%), 1 VME (2%)) and CC CA was 96.3% (1 ME (3%), 2 VMEs (4%)). Despite high error rates, the categorical agreement was acceptable (>90%) for all three antibiotics between AD and Etest. In-house susceptibility testing by gradient diffusion can allow for testing of fastidious organisms that may not survive transport to specialized laboratories; however, the method is not without technical challenges. Characterization of resistance mechanisms, increased AD dilutions, and testing from the same inoculum may determine if the observed errors reflect technical issues or breakpoints that need optimization. IMPORTANCE Routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of Helicobacter pylori by agar dilution is difficult to perform and not practical in most clinical microbiology laboratories. The Etest gradient diffusion method can be a reliable alternative for H. pylori AST with the advantage of being a less laborious quantitative method. This work reveals that an optimized Etest method can provide acceptable performance for H. pylori AST and describes the challenges associated with this methodology.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing
    Megraud, Francis
    Lehours, Philippe
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2007, 20 (02) : 280 - +
  • [2] Helicobacter pylori susceptibility testing by disc diffusion
    McNulty, C
    Owen, R
    Tompkins, D
    Hawtin, P
    McColl, K
    Price, A
    Smith, G
    Teare, L
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 49 (04) : 601 - 609
  • [3] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori in a large multicenter trial:: the MACH 2 study
    Mégraud, F
    Lehn, N
    Lind, T
    Bayerdörffer, E
    O'Morain, C
    Spiller, R
    Unge, P
    Van Zanten, SV
    Wrangstadh, M
    Burman, CF
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 43 (11) : 2747 - 2752
  • [4] Validation of a disk diffusion method for macrolide susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori
    Fauchère, JL
    GUT, 1999, 45 : A9 - A9
  • [5] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori comes of age
    O'Morain, Colm
    Smith, Sinead M.
    LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 8 (07): : 593 - 595
  • [6] Re-assessment of the disk diffusion technique for routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori
    Tang, Xiaoqiong
    Shen, Yalin
    Hu, Renwei
    Yang, Tiankuo
    Benghezal, Mohammed
    Li, Hong
    Tang, Hong
    HELICOBACTER, 2020, 25 (04)
  • [7] EVALUATION OF THE E-TEST FOR QUANTITATIVE ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF HELICOBACTER-PYLORI
    GLUPCZYNSKI, Y
    LABBE, M
    HANSEN, W
    CROKAERT, F
    YOURASSOWSKY, E
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 29 (09) : 2072 - 2075
  • [8] Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter pylori Determined by Microdilution Method Using a New Medium
    Sisto, Francesca
    Scaltrito, Maria Maddalena
    Russello, Giuseppe
    Bonomi, Arianna
    Dubini, Francesco
    CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 58 (06) : 559 - 563
  • [9] Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter pylori Determined by Microdilution Method Using a New Medium
    Francesca Sisto
    Maria Maddalena Scaltrito
    Giuseppe Russello
    Arianna Bonomi
    Francesco Dubini
    Current Microbiology, 2009, 58 : 559 - 563
  • [10] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori implications for clinical practice
    Shmuely, H
    Niv, Y
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2001, 3 (04): : 266 - 268